Ed Team

Quote of the day

Filed By Ed Team | February 06, 2007 1:35 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Quote of the Day
Tags: amendment, homophobic behavior, Indiana, Indy Star, INTake, LGBT community, marriage, SJR-7

"This amendment is not just about your opinion on whether gay marriage stacks up to heterosexual marriage. Aside from denying gay couples any domestic partner benefits under the law, including the possibility of civil unions, this amendment also has potential unintended consequences for unmarried heterosexuals.

The Star's February 1, 2007 editorial noted such potential problems. They include the difficulty in prosecuting domestic violence cases against non-married couples and allowing businesses to value gay employees by establishing domestic partner benefits. Maybe Mr. Swarens [link mine] and the proponents of this amendment just don't care that there could be serious consequences for non-married couples. But could they really be so determined in their opposition that they would sacrifice others just to ensure that gay families operate under the worst possible conditions?

I imply that gay families will still operate under these conditions precisely because they have already. They have formed unions and had children despite societal norms and will continue to do so regardless of any new amendment. Love has a way of defying authority; regardless of orientation, love doesn't care that a government, majority opinion, or religious fascism doesn't strictly approve. By advocating for this amendment, proponents are hoping to discourage gay couples by taking away any possibility of stability that most citizens enjoy by default. And, by proxy, they'll screw some unfortunate non-married heterosexuals." -- INTake blogger David Hunter


Recent Entries Filed under Quote of the Day:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


Red it and Weep | February 6, 2007 1:53 PM

Last week's edition of Newsweek, carried a guest column in the "My Turn" section, from a Mother, who lamented:

that her talented gay son, supposedly just graduating college, would move to Canada rather than continue to live here. Here, in a nation where 20-25 states are actively soncisdering or have passed hatefuil Amendments like the one proposed here.

Canada, of course, recognizes and even promotes gay marriage.

It should be required reading for all of us, and all of our legislators.

The unintended consequences for unmarried straight couples are precisely what sunk the anti-equality amendment in Arizona. The anti-Prop 107 campaign went out of its way, actually, to not mention gay couples. Lots and lots of pictures of cuddly senior citizens, though.

I wonder if this story is Governor Daniel's way of fighting the brain drain that is sure to come if the amendment passes:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/EDUCATION/02/06/brain.drain.ap/index.html