The Indianapolis Star is now reporting that SJR-7 will be heard for the second time in committee on next Tuesday. The place and time are still undetermined according to Chair Scott Pelath (D - Michigan City).
An interesting part of the article:
Opponents have said that sentence could jeopardize domestic-partner benefits offered by companies and protection for unmarried couples under the state's domestic violence laws. Supporters say neither is possible.House Minority Leader Brian C. Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said today he plans to draft a resolution stating that the House has no intent to impact domestic-partner benefits or the state's domestic violence laws.
What's Brian got up his sleeve? Anyone have any insight or ideas?
Share
Like what you read? Subscribe to The Bilerico Project by Email.
Want others to read it too? Use the buttons and links here to share this entry with others. (Move your cursor over a button or link to learn more about it.)
1 Comment
« The Pro-Cancer forces at the statehouse | Home | SJR-7: More evidence of what Senator Hershman knew, and when he knew it. »
By writing a resolution stating that they need to clarify the intent aren't they in fact stating that the current language is inadequate?
kb
kb | March 30, 2007 12:40 AM
Reply to this comment