Alex Blaze

Queer weekend reader

Filed By Alex Blaze | June 30, 2007 9:49 PM | comments

Filed in: The Movement
Tags: Weekend Queer Reader

  • Jessica Hoffman examines Western imperialist thought during her recent trip to Abu Dhabi:

    My head is telling me that (as cultural critic Stephanie Abraham says) "to veil or not to veil" is not the question, but my body's holding on to some fears and rigid readings of a culture I don't deeply understand, and in the confusing space between my resistance to the gender oppressions I know and the culturally imperialist readings of Islamic culture I've been fed in these here United States, that body screamed "No!"

  • The Advocate interviews Donald Hitchcock, the guy suing the DNC for firing him:

    The fund-raisers in the Democratic Party feel that they can't be held accountable for defaming somebody, and they're exempt from consequences when they go out and slander people that used to work for the Democratic Party. This lawsuit's about holding them accountable and holding the Democratic Party to our values.

  • Rick Perlstein questions why Democratic politics don't reflect America's liberal majority as expressed in polling:

    Here's a riddle: What's an "independent"? More and more, it's an American who holds positions we associate with Democrats but who refuses to call himself by the name. Why? Part of the reason is that people say to themselves, ;If only there was a party that thought like me--that was for harnessing the power of government to help the needy and protect the middle class; for reining in business excess; for fighting overseas threats through soft power instead of reckless force." But they don't find today's Democrats answering to the description.


  • Ted Haggard outer Mike Jones tells more about his encounters with the good pastor:

    Ted Haggard was a nice man. He was kind of quiet, had boyish looks. When I think about what he wrote when he resigned versus the way he was when we were together -- the way he wanted the room basically dark with only one little candle lit -- in his letter of apology to his congregation, he used the words "repulsive and dark" [to describe his gay sex encounters], and that explained a lot to me, actually.


  • Scott LeMieux deconstructs conservative claims to "originalist" jurisprudence:

    We are often informed (sometimes by the Justices themselves) that the Court's conservatives have a more legitimate jurisprudence because their "originalist" philosophy prevents them from simply making decisions that follow their political views. The affirmative action jurisprudence of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, however, makes clear that "originalism" can easily be stretched or even ignored entirely if it interferes with strongly held policy preferences.


Recent Entries Filed under The Movement:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.