Alex Blaze

Gravel on the Huffington Post

Filed By Alex Blaze | July 12, 2007 1:29 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics
Tags: HRC, Mike Gravel, money, presidential debate

Mike Gravel has a post up at the Huffington Post about being snubbed by the HRC. Here's a bit:

Fighting for a hated minority is a pretty dumb way to get elected president. And obviously it hasn't helped with my fundraising. But I want to live in a country where there are no second-class citizens. As long as our nation deprives gays and lesbians of basic rights, including marriage, we have not fulfilled the promise of the Declaration of Independence guaranteeing life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to all Americans.

Oh, there's more....

He's right - we aren't the most popular people in the country right now. So it makes sense to point out that the HRC making participation in its debate a mere popularity contest is, you know, contradictory, silly, and ultimately counterproductive.

According to a HRC spokesperson, I didn't raise enough money and therefore my candidacy did not meet their standard of "viability." But that's strange -- CNN, PBS, NBC and the NAACP invited me to their debates without evaluating my financial viability. Ironically I think the real reason why HRC didn't invite me is that I'm too vocal in my advocacy of gay rights. None of the top tier candidates would have been comfortable facing an opponent who consistently points out their refusal to embrace true equality for gays and lesbians. HRC simply bowed to the star factor. It's just a shame that this travesty was perpetrated in the name of the LGBT community.

Really? Our HRC is more concerned with star power than with its goal of advancing legal equality? Never would have thought.

We're oppressed because we aren't as rich or popular as straight people are, HRC, and it's not going to change unless we challenge the system that favors money and popularity over egalitarianism and principle.

Why don't they get it?


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


Kevin Lahti | July 12, 2007 4:27 PM

This debate is really not complete then, especially considering where Gravel stands on the issues... the other candidates as I believe dont actually see gay marriage as a civil right issue as Gravel does, I feel they more or less believe that they can use it as a cop-out to ensure gay voters. I feel that his exclusion from this debate is very shameful of the HRC. I hope they realize the mistake they are making by leaving out the ONLY candidate who has said.. "I think love between a man and another man or a woman and another woman is beautiful"

"None of the top tier candidates would have been comfortable facing an opponent who consistently points out their refusal to embrace true equality for gays and lesbians. HRC simply bowed to the star factor."

This is absurdity! Here we have a candidate who is:
1) Pro-america - he is running for president after all
2) Pro-military - he would rather overturn DADT than the military
3) Pro-gay marriage - what could be a bigger icon of mainstream gay assimilation??

And he is employing progressive, anti-assimilation critiques of HRC!!! I love the confusion it creates!