Terrance Heath

Hate Crimes on Wikipedia: The Panic Rooms, Pt 1.

Filed By Terrance Heath | August 01, 2007 11:11 AM | comments

Filed in: Politics
Tags:

I guess it was inevitable when I started this project that I would come across cases that would make me think about how easily, as a gay man, I could have found myself in the victims' shoes. I think back to when I was a single gay man, and how any of the men I met up with back then could have killed me after coming back to my place or taking me to theirs. Alone, in a room with no other witnesses to say what happened. It's a motif that runs through several of the stories I find myself immersed in during the course of this project; those few minutes when the victim and perpetrator disappear into a haze, and only one emerges to tall the tale.

In cases like that of Richie Phillps, the story is one of the victim attacking the killer, and thus "bringing it on himself," as the defense attorney essentially put it during the trial for Phillips' murder. And in some states like Kentucky where Phllips' was murdered in 2005 — his body folded in a suitcase and tossed into a lake — laws called "stand-your-ground" laws come very close to codifying what's known as the "gay panic" defense. In Phillips' case, that may have worked to the benefit of his killer, Joseph Cottrell, who becomes eligible for parole this year — 2 1/2 years after his manslaughter conviction for a murder his own relatives testified was planned and and motivated by the sexual orientation of the victim.

Depending, of course, on who you think is the victim. Or who the jury thinks is the victim.

Read the story of Richie Phillips and decide for yourself.

Free Image Hosting at allyoucanupload.comGuin "Richie" Phillips (1967 - June 17, 2003) was a 36-year-old gay man in Rineyville, Kentucky. Phillips disappeared on June 17, 2003. His body was found on June 25, 2003, in a suitcase in Rough River Lake.

The Background

On July 17, 2003, Phillips was seen having lunch at a restaurant in Elizabethtown, Kentucky, with a friend later identified by investigators as 21-year-old Joshua Cottrell. [1]Several days later, his truck and other belongings were found abandoned in southern Indiana. A witness later told police she saw Phillips and Cottrell together in Phillips' truck the same day. That was the last time Phillps was seen alive.

Phillips' mother -- Marge Phillips -- reported her son missing and told police she feared he had been harmed because he was gay.[2]

Discovery & Arrest

On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, two fishermen pulled a suitcase out of Rough River Lake, unzipped it and found Richie Phillips body inside. Phillips was identified by personal items found with the body and a Wildcat tattoo on the shoulder.[3]

On Friday, June 27, 2003, Cottrell -- an acquaintance of Phillips' was arrested and charged with Phillips murder. Prosecutors announced that they would seek the death penalty in the case.[4]

Trial & Testimony

Cottrell was arraigned on June 28, 2005, at the Breckenridge County Courthouse, where he pleaded not guilty to charges of murdering Phillips. He was then held on $500,000 bond.[5]

In October 2003 Cottrell's trial was moved to Hardin County based on forensic evidence that showed Phillips was most likely killed in Cottrell's Elizabethtown hotel room. The change in jurisdiction delayed the start of the trial.

A canceled check introduced into evidence showed that Cottrell purchased the suitcase six days before the murder. Drops of Phillips' blood were found on the bathroom tiles in the hotel. Cottrell's DNA was also found on a cigarette in Cottrell's truck. Previously investigators were unsure whether Phillips had been been killed at Rough River Lake, where his body was found, or elsewhere.[6]

In May 2004, the trial was further delayed when Judge Henry Bland ordered a continuance after Cottrell's defense attorney filed new discovery documents.[7]. The trial got under way in January 2005, at the Hardin County courthouse.

Friend & Family Testimony

Rob Dewitt, a friend who introduced Phillips to Cottrell three years earlier said that Cottrell bought a set of luggage at the Elizabethtown JCPenny. Cottrell told Dewitt that he was planning to travel. Dewitt testified in court that he told Cottrell that Phillips was attracted to him, and that Cottrell said he would "cold-cock" Phillips he ever made a pass at him. Dewitt also testified that he had never seen Phillips act in an aggressive manner.[8]

Cottrell's aunt -- Wendy McAnly -- testified that Cottrell confessed to the crime more than a week earlier, but his family didn't believe him. Cottrell's aunt and cousin testified that he had planned to kill Phillips because he was gay, and had lured Phillips into his hotel room where he hit and strangled him.

McAnly said that Cottrell invited Phillips to his Elizabethtown motel room. When Phillips arrived, Cottrell asked if Phillips liked him without his shirt, and when Phillips said yes and touched him, Cottrell put him in a headlock and choked him.[9]

Cottrell's cousin -- Tara Gaddie -- testified that arrived at her home in Phillips' truck after disposing of his body in Rough River Lake, and answered "He's gone. He's dead," when she asked him what he'd done. Gaddie also said she never heard Cottrell talk about strangling Phillips or use derogatory terms to describe him.[10]

Cottrell's Testimony

In court, Cottrell testified that Phillips came into his motel room uninvited, after he drove Phillips around Elizabethtown looking for a job, tried to kiss him, and attempted to force him into oral sex. Cottrell then put Phillips in a headlock, pulled him to the floor and "started hitting him as hard as I could, as many times as I could."

When he realized Phillips was dead, Cottrell says he panicked and put his body into the suit case he said in court he'd brought to haul his belongings as he drifted between motel rooms and friends houses.[11]

"Gay Panic Defense"

Cottrell's defense attorney employed what is called a gay panic defense, arguing that Phillips' own actions "led to a chain of events that caused his death, " and that Cottrell was within his rights under Kentucky law to fight back to protect himself from being raped, including use of deadly force if necessary. "But what set it all in motion, he was privileged to do," Drabenstadt said. "What set it in motion were the actions of a 36-year-old man."[12]

Drabestadt may have been referring to a Kentucky "stand-your-ground" law permitting people to use deadly force to protect themselves against death, serious physical injury, kidnapping, and forced sexual intercourse.[13] In February 2001, Kentucky Representative Bob Damron sponsored a bill that would have added "deviant sexual intercourse" to the existing law. The Kentucky House Judiciary Committee amended the measure to replace "deviant sexual intercourse" with "forced sodomy," and clarify its definitions of "force," "threat," and "attempt."[14]

Prosecuting attorney Chris Shaw argued in closing that Cottrell lured Phillips to his room in order to kill him, and then attempted to cover it up in a cold, calculated manner. Shaw added that Phillips' sexual orientation was immaterial in the case, except for Cottrell's "steaming anger" toward gay men. Shaw said that if Phillips made sexual advances Cottrell should have walked away.[15]

Verdict & Sentencing

After deliberating for nine hours, the jury returned with its verdict. The jury had the option of finding Cottrell guilty of murder, reckless homicide, or manslaughter. The jury rejected the murder charge and instead found Cottrell guilty of second degree manslaughter, theft by taking of more than 300 dollars, and tampering with physical evidence.[16]

Contrell was sentenced on March 1, 2005. The jury recommended Cottrell be sentenced to 30 years; 20 for manslaughter, and another ten for theft and tampering with evidence. However, state law limited the judge to sentencing Cottrell to a maximum of 20 years.[17]

In Kentucky, committing a crime against someone because of the victim's sexual orientation is considered a hate crime. At sentencing, a judge may deny probation or parole if it's determined that the victim's race, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or religion was a "primary factor" in committing the offense. The prosecution in Cottrell's case did not pursue hate crime charges against him.

Neither the defense nor the victim's family had immediate comment on the verdict or sentencing. One month later Greg Phillips, the victim's brother, told The Advocate, "I think they were looking at my brother being a homosexual when they made their decision to pick the lesser charge."[18]

Cottrell will be eligible for parole in 2 1/2. year after his conviction.

Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


A. J. Lopp | August 1, 2007 1:15 PM

As someone who lives close to Louisville, Kentucky and is connected to several GLBT groups in that city, I believe there is one aspect of this crime and trial that deserves mention: That is that the GLBT populace in Kentucky, to my observation, was so pre-occupied by the anti-gay-marriage constitutional amendment that was moving through Frankfort at the time, that this case did not attract the focused attention of the Kentucky GLBT community, nor did it precipitate the discussion that one might think it would.

There may be an explanation of why the prosecutor did not try this case as a hate crime: Although to us the prejudicial nature of this crime may be apparent, there was a dirth of "objective" evidence [i.e. evidence that would stand up under court challenges] that could be used to ascertain Cotrell's anti-gay prejudice. Why? This perpetrator may have been so calculating that he deliberately avoided such self-expressions --- even though that is inconsistent with his having apparently admitted the crime.

So, interestingly, (1) the news media did not cover this crime as a hate crime (taking their cues from the law enforcement investigators, who are reluctant to acknowledge a hate crime without unquestionable evidence), (2) the prosecuting attorney did not pursue a hate crimes conviction, and (3) the GLBT community seemed already shell-shocked by the anti-gay constitutional amendment, which unfortunately many regarded politically as an unstoppable steamroller. Together, these aspects created a "perfect storm" of injustice.

The moral (IMHO): Laws against hate crimes sometimes can serve little purpose without a populace that insists that they be implemented, enforced, and utilized in prosecutions appropriately.

Thank you, Terrence, for this post. This is a story that deserves not to be allowed to fade into the past.