Pam Spaulding

Team Obama's big gay blunders

Filed By Pam Spaulding | October 27, 2007 2:36 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics
Tags: Andy Sidden, Barack Obama, Donnie McClurkin

Rev. Andy Sidden, pastor of Garden of Grace United Church of Christ in Columbia, SC, was the openly gay minister selected by the Barack Obama campaign to deliver a message of tolerance to the likely overwhelmingly black audiences who will attend concerts this weekend featuring recloseted/now-decloseted anti-gay Grammy winning gospel singer Donnie McClurkin.


The fact that Sidden is white (I spoke with the pastor directly on Friday -- he identified himself and stated plainly that he's white; since the question was still open in some minds) has started up a chatter on the blogs, and Mike Signorile wanted to ask him about it on his show. Here's the segment (use the player below or this link):



On this blog , Mike commented on the strange shenanigans that went on surrounding Rev. Sidden's booking. More below the fold.

He's a nice guy and was gracious and happy to come on my show yesterday -- at least, that was in the morning, when my producer, David Guggenheim, booked him. Later on, he was reticent, almost canceled, clearly getting pressure from the Obama campaign not to do it (he mentioned a name of someone at the campaign -- Joshua -- and this was shortly after someone called us to cancel for him, but we could not, bizarrely, identify who that was; the Obama campaign later wrote my producer to say that no one at the campaign had called to cancel for him, but the call came on our guest hotline, which general listeners do not have). The question is, why were they trying to stop him from coming on?

One of the reasons might have to do with this: On the show he did not deny African-American lesbian blogger Jasmyne Cannick's description of him as white. I must say that this was baffling. I did not even think for a minute that the Obama campaign would choose a white minister to bring the message of acceptance of homosexuality to a black audience at a gospel concert featuring a hugely popular antigay black gospel singer. I assumed from his photo that Rev. Andy Sidden was black and light-skinned, or biracial. Sidden also told me he was not an Obama supporter, and accepted the invitation because he'd never turn away someone who asked him to pray.

***

To make matters worse, news that the Obama camp actually rejected two gay black pastors and two gay affirming ones, including Michael Eric Dyson also came out yesterday. Rod 2.0 had the scoop.

Several sources inside and outside the campaign confirm the names of TWO openly gay black pastors suggested by the National Black Justice Coalition and the Human Rights Campaign were rejected in favor of Rev. Sidden. Those names are: Bishop Yvette Flunder, an outstanding pastor and orator from San Francisco and Bishop Tonyia Rawls of Unity Fellowship in North Carolina. In addition, Bishop Carlton Pearson of Oklahoma, whose inclusive ministry welcomes the LGBT community, was also rejected. A campaign source says Rev. Michael Eric Dyson , the so-called hip-hop intellectual, reportedly volunteered and was also rejected. Dyson is a prominent Obama supporter and very popular in hip-hop and with youth.

"We decided to go with someone local," says our source in the Obama campaign, who expressed concerns around finding a "local" gay pastor in Obama's own United Church of Christ. Bishop Flunder is affiliated with the UCC, but, there was no such concern around Hezekiah Walker and Donnie McClurkin who are in the Pentecostal Church.

The last thing a crowd of black folks who have a problem with homosexuality needs is: 1) to be "told" by the Obama campaign that a message about tolerance must be delivered from a white voice of faith, and 2) to have their beliefs confirmed that being gay is "a white man's perversion." Coming from a white pastor under these circumstances, can only be seen as paternalistic and patronizing; the shields of defensiveness will go up, the message will be ignored.

The most stinging message that the Obama campaign has sent is that they apparently didn't see the relevance or necessity of removing the ability of religious blacks to stay in denial, that somehow there is not an intersection of being black and gay. This move renders us invisible yet again, as politically expendable, because it telegraphs that it's too politically volatile to address the division in the community by having them confront one of their own -- black gay and gay-affirming ministers -- when it comes to looking at bigotry.

Alvin McEwan of Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters:

We have been given the hook, pushed to the side, had the trapdoor to the alligator pit released under our feet.

LGBTs of color haven't been just pushed to the back of the bus in this controversy. We have been kicked off of the bus and told to find our own way home.

Perhaps Obama's people couldn't find an openly gay black pastor in time for the event? I don't know. I guess I will give them a little slack.

No, I can't cut these folks any slack. Did they ask the National Black Justice Coalition for a recommendation for a pastor? I certainly saw a whole lot of them when I attended the organization's National Black Church Summit this year.

Obama and his staff were obviously present at the CNN's YouTube Presidential debate. Did they have iPods on when Rev. Reggie Longcrier, pastor of Exodus Missionary Outreach Church in Hickory, N.C. asked this question of John Edwards?

Sen. Edwards has said his opposition to gay marriage has been influenced by his Southern Baptist background. We know religion was once used to justify slavery, segregation and women not being allowed to vote, all of which today are recognized as unconstitutional and socially and morally wrong. So why is it still acceptable to use religion to justify denying gay and lesbian American their full and equal rights.

Certainly I would have had Longcrier on speed dial after that.

***

The problem with the top-tier Democratic candidates, including Obama, is that they have voluntarily sought the religious vote by citing their religious beliefs as a reason to deny civil marriage for gays and lesbians. Not only that, the Democratic Party has spent a lot of time, energy and money trying to find out how to court the religious (specifically evangelical) vote. Religion holds no place in the campaign, or in government, other than to support the right of people to practice and exercise it.

Obama has been a friend to the LGBT community (other than his lack of support for civil marriage for gays and lesbians). That, however, doesn't let him off the hook for being surrounded by complete ineptitude on this issue with McClurkin.

Once he opened the Pandora's box of personal religious convictions, Obama -- or any candidate -- cannot then step back and pretend they hold no responsibility for crossing that line when the going gets tough.


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

Would you believe Star Parker over at WorldNetDaily makes a good point?

We've got legislation moving through Congress, pushed by gay activists, that would make it illegal for an employer not to hire or fire someone because of his or her sexual orientation. But the head of the nation's largest gay-activist organization asks Obama to fire a man because he is a Christian and an advocate of traditional values?
We're discriminating against this guy on the basis of his religion, and/or sexual orientation.

"But that's different! It's a political campaign, and this sends the wrong message! It makes it seem like we approve of homophobia!"

As for Rev Sidden, our criticism of him is that he's the wrong race.

"But that's different! The people he's trying to reach won't identify with him!"

Try as I might, I can't see any difference between this, and a member of the Religious Reich complaining that they have to hire one of them Homer-Sexuals.
It will give the impression that we approve of their Pre-Version! Our customers won't identify with someone who's a Faggot!"

We need an inclusive ENDA to stop bigotry, even when the bigotry has some practical justification. Especially when it has some practical justification. Especially when the bigotry is our own, and we don't even realise we're practicing it. Even when we get called out by it by the less-than-unbigoted World Net Daily.

I don't think the ENDA fight is an apt comparison, even though it wouldn't stop Parker from using it considering truth and logic are just something she spits on on her way to attaining her agenda.

It isn't like McClurkin has stable employment with the Obama campaign. he's not depending on this job to eat or get housing. He's not depending on it at all because it's just three shows. Also, people aren't saying that Obama should distance himself from him because of his religion or his sexuality. I think Pam and others who criticize the Obama campaign would be in favor of him hiring gay people! I think it's interesting that the Religious Right, for all their complaining about bias against Christians, will automatically equate "Christian" with "homophobic", which they implicitly do when they say that McClurkin is being attacked for his religion. I don't see anything religious in him being messed up.

On the Rev Sidden, again, ENDA-like protections wouldn't apply because it's simply not employment. Also, he's playing a role here more than doing a job where identity doesn't matter. If someone were producing a movie about the Jim Crow era, while it would be possible to hire a mix of Black, white, Asian, latino, Middle Eastern, and Native people to play the roles of the Black and white characters, it would confuse the audience as to who's whom and make the movie harder to follow and appreciate. Since the Rev. is playing a role where his identity is important for the purpose of a spectacle (and this whole thing is a spectacle), then I don't see any problem in seeking out someone of a specific race.

The whole mess is a sad spectacle of the state of race relations and homophobia inside of religion.

correction, alex: McClurkin isn't appearing at "just three shows"; in reality, it's just ONE show. The whole nonsense about him "touring with Obama" has been lies from very beginning.