I am taking a seminar in my Ph.D. program focused on the work of James Baldwin and reading for my final paper I came across this quote,

In 1963, when speaking to a group of public school teachers in New York City, James Baldwin was asked to talk about the role the white liberal plays in social change. Baldwin responded, “There is no role for the white liberal, he is our affliction.”

This quote, taken out of the context of the rest of Baldwin's work, makes him seem to be less open and nuanced in his approaches to white folks than he was. However it got me thinking about allies.

Considering the complicated recent events around ENDA and transgender inclusion along with the conversations on the Bilerico Project about Transgender Day of Remembrance, it seems like as a project - both as writers and readers - we should engage in a conversation about allies. After the jump are some questions that I have been considering regarding this. Would you be willing to share your thoughts with each other and me about the place of allies in social change projects and movements?

Shop TLA Video

What does it mean to be an ally?

Are there ways that being a white person who is an ally to black communities, being a man who is an ally to women, being straight and ally to lgbt folk and being non-transgender and an ally to transgender people are similar? Different?

As members of oppressed groups what do we look for in non-members who want to be allies?

Are allies helpful or harmful to progress? Is it something in between?

Baldwin talks about the danger of allies with savior complexes. Have any of us had experiences with allies who thought of their role in that way?

If you think of yourself as an ally, what are some of the challenges that you have experienced in doing ally work?

Any other thoughts or questions for each other are welcome.

« Homotextual: Barack Obama | Home | Another reason to question Kucinich's sanity »