Rembrandt's "Return of the Prodigal Son" doesn't an anti-gay tract cover make
Filed by: Alex Blaze
February 12, 2008 11:11 AM
Look what Jim Burroway found.![]()
Seriously, why not just call the thing "The Gay Guide to the Church of England, 2008"?
The art is Rembrandt's "Return of the Prodigal Son," but without the context of that name, and the positioning of the prodigal son in relation to his father, one gets the idea that this book's take on gays is way different than what's really inside.
(Click to enlarge)






C'mon - you have to admit that's brilliant marketing. At least they know their target audience.
Bil Browning | February 12, 2008 3:21 PM
Reply to this comment
Oh, well. Just goes to show that sometimes people with the best of intentions really don't know what they're saying.
Ye Olde Fart | February 12, 2008 4:25 PM
Reply to this comment
So you're saying you can't judge a book by its cover?
Serena Freewomyn | February 12, 2008 4:53 PM
Reply to this comment
Dr. Nicolsi is the author of one of the chapters inside of that cover.
It is not friendly towards us.
MauraHennessey | February 12, 2008 7:58 PM
Reply to this comment