From my mom:

Gina,

I know you don't believe in marriage, but for those who do and want their unions recognized, this is a huge victory.

From my dad:

Besides, Shannon Minter [an old friend] argued the case.

From me:

Your Ad Here

You know, you're both absolutely adorable.

And GO SHANNON!

And, my feelings about marriage are complicated.

I believe in the seperation of church and state, and for the state to be involved in marriage -- which, to my mind, should be a spiritual and personal decision, not a decision that the state is involved in -- is weird to me. Always has been, honestly. I just don't want the state in my heart or my pants.

When I think about marriage as a personal/spiritual choice, as an Act of Love? I'm actually kind of a softie and a romantic. I don't see myself ever getting married, for a lot of reasons. But I've seen friends and family get married as an Act of Love, and it's made me pretty damned happy for them.

When I think about marriage as an Act of the State, it's much more complicated for me:

I don't believe that marriage should privilege people in couples over people who aren't in couples. I don't believe that marriage should be peoples' keys to things like health care or ability to see partners in the hospital or whether or not they get citizenship in this country. Which is part of why I'm frustrated that the queer (well, no, the mainstream gay & lesbian movement, really) has put so much energy into fighting for marriage, as opposed to fighting for things like universal health care and immigrant rights. There's just something very elitist about the "rights for people in married couples, not for people who aren't in married couples" mentality that colors the marriage equality movement. I want *everyone* to have those rights and those choices, not just married couples.

That said: I don't at all begrudge people who get married to access the rights I just mentioned. You make do with what you have to get by, you know? And the fact that now same-sex couples can make this choice in California *is* pretty fucking huge. I am happy that friends of mine in same-sex couples can now access things that friends of mine who are in opposite-sex couples have always had access to. This means more access for more people, which is a kind of progress.

But I maintain that the rights that marriage allows people to access should be accessible for all people, not just marriedz.

Okay, off my soapbox.

Love you,
Gina

« The Reasoning of the CA Supreme Court | Home | California Supreme Court OKs Marriage for Gays - But It Ain't Over Yet »