Pam Spaulding

Bush 'Austin 12' divided about supporting McCain

Filed By Pam Spaulding | July 02, 2008 4:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics
Tags: John McCain, Log Cabin Republicans

Talk about adding even more pressure on the Log Cabin Republicans. The group of prominent gay GOPers who participated in a meeting with Bush in 2000 to request that he move toward building a more inclusive administration and GOP -- and who were later burned by his support of the Federal Marriage Amendment -- are torn over McCain. Some of them say they will support and vote for Obama in the fall, others aren't exactly ready to "go there" but are publicly unhappy with McCain.

The Washington Blade interviewed several of them -- and it's clear they realize that blind support of the Republican Party as long as it continues to cleave to the religious right is damaging to the LGBT community as a whole.

In all, three said they either would vote for Obama or are seriously considering it; three are undecided between McCain and Obama; three are backing McCain and three others declined to comment.

...David Greer, who was appointed to Bush's AIDS advisory board in 2003, left the Republican Party that same year and has been a registered Democrat since then. He said gay Republicans would never be a strong enough voice to influence the GOP and that the party is more interested in exploiting gay Republicans for political gain.

"As long as there's a far right in the party, gay Republicans are way too small in numbers ... to have any effect on the party," he said. "We actually end up doing greater and lasting harm to the whole GLBT community."

Greer isn't ready to embrace Obama, but he and DC at-large City Council member David Catania (who will vote for Obama) agree that there's no way gay Republicans can spin McCain as acceptable given his views on our issues. "I wouldn't give supporting him a second thought. The cards are on the table. I think gays are kind of kidding themselves if they think John McCain is going to be any better for the gay community than George Bush."Another, Brian Bennett, is point blank about the LCRs, saying it would be a mistake for the group to endorse McCain. The bottom line for Daniel Stewart, is that he is leaving the GOP because there has been no forward momentum in overcoming the right wing death grip on the party:

Stewart was elected to the City Council in Plattsburgh, N.Y., as a Democrat, but former New York Gov. George Pataki convinced him to switch to the Republican Party to run against the city's mayor in 2000. Stewart won the election.

But now Stewart is planning on leaving the Republican Party because the party is not moving where he'd like on issues that affect him personally, such as same-sex marriage. He noted his resentment over having to travel to Canada in 2004 to marry his partner.


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


The Washington Blade interviewed several of them -- and it's clear they realize that blind support of the Republican Party as long as it continues to cleave to the religious right is damaging to the LGBT community as a whole.

Damn shame they couldn't start thinking like this before they endorsed Bush, eh?

It is amazing to me that the LCR even exists anymore. A GLBT person who supports most Republicans is not unlike a Tibetan supporting the Communist Chinese. Wonder if they contribute to Focus on the Family, too?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHA! I think it's hilarious that the implication here is that McCain is either the same or worse than Bush on LGBT issues.

It's totally true, everyone in their right mind can see it, but it seems like the LCR is still worried about looking like fools in their decision to run primary ads against Romney.