Alex Blaze

Barack Obama supported same-sex marriage in 1996?

Filed By Alex Blaze | October 09, 2008 5:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics, The Movement
Tags: Barack Obama, gay marriage, lesbian, marriage, marriage equality, outlines, same-sex marriage, Windy City Times

The fundies are going wild over this one. Apparently the archives of Outlines, a Chicago-based gay paper that merged with the Windy City Times in 2000, show that Obama supported same-sex marriage back in 1996. This is from their election guide:

13TH DISTRICT

Democrat: Barack Obama. Supports gay rights, same-sex marriage; increased AIDS funding, abortion rights, affirmative action. Endorsed by IFHR, IMPACT, IVI-IPO, Illinois and Chicago NOW, Personal PAC.

Republican: Rosette Caldwell Peyton

Harold Washington Party: David Whitehead

"IFHR" is the Illinois Federation for Human Right PAC, an old Illinois gay rights PAC that's now Equality Illinois.

Updated after the jump.

This isn't going to be a game-changer, since people (at least the people who haven't decided yet), aren't going to vote just on same-sex marriage this year, especially since the president doesn't do all that much when it comes to same-sex marriage.

It's more indicative of the position Democratic candidates have taken regarding marriage, deciding that no matter their personal views on it, it's not a winning issue for them. So now he supports all the rights of marriage, but not the name, being open to same-sex couples.

That said, I am a bit surprised that this is coming out right now, so late in the campaign season.

Here's Outlines' methodology:

OUTLINES here provides information on all Chicago-area state candidates, drawn from OUTLINES and/or IMPACT questionnaires, information from other endorsing organizations, and the candidates' voting records, particularly on state lesbigay-rights legislation and the state ban on same-sex marriage. If no information is given for a particular candidate, that means none was available.

Candidates endorsed by the Illinois Federation for Human Rights (IFHR) Political Action Committee all have either supported the state gay-rights bill or supported gay rights in another jurisdiction. Additionally, the IFHR PAC gave campaign contributions to all those who voted against the marriage ban. Those endorsed by Personal PAC have 100 percent pro-choice records or questionnaire responses; those rated "preferred" by Personal PAC have taken mostly pro-choice stances.


Update: I contacted Tracy Baim, the current publisher of the Windy City Times, who was the publisher of Outlines in 1996. She thinks the response came from an IMPACT questionnaire (IMPACT is now defunct). Here's what Trudy Ring, the author of the voting guide, remembered:

I did not interview Obama--sad to say, I've never met him--and all I remember about the story was that it was a lot of work and I went off of groups' endorsements and their questionnaire responses. Like Tracy said, IMPACT is defunct, and the answer may well have been from its questionnaire. I'm thinking, however, that Obama may have just said did not favor the same-sex marriage ban that had been passed earlier that year by the Illinois legislature, before he was a member. Of course, Illinois did not then and does not now marry same-sex couples, but in 1996 many states (and the federal government!) were enacting specific bans because of the case going through the Hawaii courts that was expected to legalize same-sex marriage there.

Since we don't have the original questionnaire results, this might have been a response taken out of context that the right is using to fear monger and pick up votes. Obama's been consistent in his opposition to same-sex marriage.

Not that there's any proof that he didn't support same-sex marriage back in the 90's and then change his position for the national election....

The fear mongering won't work anyway - McCain's not going to win on homophobia at this point. The problems people are voting on are too material to worry about something like that.


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


Robert Ganshorn Robert Ganshorn | October 10, 2008 1:17 AM

I think where his position was when he was running for state legislature is indicative of a bias in our favor, but as you say, he is not running for a position where he can be materially be effective.

candace mitchell | October 10, 2008 3:15 PM

Surprise....I politician changes his tune when it convienient.....shocker!

It surprises me that we all think that Obama is any different. He wouldn't have made it this far in politics if he wasn't a politician.

Honestly, the guide could have just misappropriated his views or made an assumption. Unless their is a written questionnaire submitted by Obama to back up the assertion, this is all smoke and no fire.

Andrew Yu-Jen Wang | March 6, 2009 12:24 AM

Speaking of Barack Obama:

Barack Obama is a racial-minority individual, and in his heart and mind he inevitably does not endorse hate crimes committed by George W. Bush.

George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).

George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.

Many people know what Bush did.

And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.

Bush was absolute evil.

Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

Bush is a psychological prisoner.

Bush has a lot to worry about.

Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

“GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
______________________
I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.