Bo Shuff

Log Cabin Greed

Filed By Bo Shuff | November 03, 2008 3:30 PM | comments

Filed in: Living, Marriage Equality, Politics, Politics, The Movement
Tags: Barack Obama, general election, GOP, greed, John McCain, LGBT voters, log cabin republicans

Self preservation is human nature. It is in fact animal nature. However, one of the fundamental components of the American psyche is a sense of community. That those defined in common by geography, demography or other common factor will look out for each other and, to some extent, advocate on behalf of others within the same community.

We stick together for the greater common good, and we know that if one of our community is harmed, we are all harmed. Unlike wild animals, we do not see an attack on one as the benefit of the rest. When the weakest wildebeest becomes lunch the remaining herd breathes a sigh of relief. When the weakest among our community is harmed, we share a collective concern and we figure out how to prevent it from happening again.

For many years I have had much discussion with Log Cabin Republicans and other LGBT people who were supporting Republicans for office, and I have attempted to be open minded and learn from them. I, at one point, even advocated for support of Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR). However, I keep coming back to a massive struggle with this type of support, for a number of reasons.

For this post, I will limit the dialogue to the comparison between Obama and McCain. I am of the opinion that a vote by an LGBT person for McCain is one of either personal greed or misinformation. Furthermore that decision runs counter to the sense of community preservation that separates us from other animal species.

I am not a single issue voter. I am a primary issue voter. I place the most import on LGBT issues because we, as a community, are still in a place where community preservation is more vital than self-interest. If two candidates' stands on those issues are the same, then I will look at additional issues in determining who to cast a vote for. This is how I originally came to support Hillary Clinton and why I now support Barack Obama.

I honestly believe that all LGBT voters, and even some of our friends and family, need to take a similar approach. The LGBT community is under constant attack, both physical and rhetorical in the United States. The laws of this country and many of our states treat us and our relationships as second-class citizens. Until such time as this isn't the case, for an LGBT individual to choose any other issue as a primary issue must be based on either personal greed that stems from an "I got mine" attitude or a head in the sand mentality that comes as a result of blissful ignorance of the actual impact of the laws and policies of this country on our community.

Basically, they either consciously or unconsciously choose to place self-interest over community advocacy.

Let's start with the greedy. I have heard McCain LGBT supporters talk about their fear of higher taxes, their desire to get a 5K tax credit for health care, the energy policy vote, etc. They have idly dismissed the two candidate's rhetoric and record on LGBT issues as they claim to not be "a single-issue" voter. How nice for them. Each and every one of these people that I have spoken to has a supportive family, live in a supportive area, own their own business or work for a supportive employer. It is a thought pattern based on the idea that if they were able to carve out a safe place for themselves, then why can't every other gay person simply stop worrying about all this LGBT stuff and just live their lives. I got mine, the rest of the people can worry about themselves. Moreover, it casts the notion that LGBT Equality is a single issue. It is not.

I honestly will not care about the tax rate as much as the collective of LGBT issues until my rights are equal to everyone else. I won't be concerned about tax credits for health care until I know that every LGBT individual in the US will not worry about losing that health care when their bigoted boss fires them. I will not be as concerned with our presence in Iraq until those of my community who choose to be there are allowed to openly. When it comes to energy, I am more concerned, honestly, with Exxon's record profits which piss me off not because it means I'm paying a bit more at the pump, but because they refuse to use any of that profit to offer domestic partner benefits to employees.

Those members of the LGBT Community who consciously chose to support a Republican for office must have the opposite world view. They must feel that the plight of people in our community is not as important as their own wealth. This group of people simply angers me as it is the utmost in greed and self-promotion.

The other group of LGBT people who support Republicans do so, I have found, because they don't take the time to research the actual impact of bigoted laws on themselves. Let's start with marriage. This debate is not about a ring, a cake and a honeymoon. This debate is about the 1100 Federal rights, the 500 some odd state rights and the local rights that flow from marriage. Those who decry tax cuts while putting people in office who deny us marriage don't quite grasp that filing joint taxes might accomplish both. How can you feel comfortable in talking about the work that you do with your partner when you may be forced to testify against that person if something ever went wrong. Can you really place any worry in the stock market or other retirement planning when your non legally married wife could be left in the cold if you were to pass away suddenly?

Being a primary issue voter when it comes to LGBT issues does not make one a single issue voter. It does not make one LGBT-centric. We are not yet at a place where we have the luxury to not be concerned first about ourselves. We must maintain a community focus. To those who would , as LGBT people or anyone who cares about LGBT people, cast a vote for John McCain or support a party that across the country has vilified our community for their own gain, I ask: How can you look me in the eye and put yourself first when many other of our brothers and sisters suffer? How can your own personal wealth be more important than a real opportunity to move our equality forward? Why are you that much more important than us?

There is a clear difference when it comes to LGBT issues in this election. The statements and records of both of the candidates vary vastly, and almost more importantly, one party has repeatedly and systematically used our community for their own personal gain. By voting in favor of them, we are guilty of the same.

(Crossposted from www.bearsleft.com)


Recent Entries Filed under The Movement:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


I don't think that homocons are putting themselves above the LGBT community, or at least I don't think that's their justification for it.

Most gay republicans I met rely heavily on that toxic tribalism republicans have been pushing for years: real Americans are white, patriotic, etc. They don't usually repeat the "heterosexual" part of that, but, well...

I remember one gay Republican I knew a few years ago, a friend of a friend's boyfriend, who was, quite simply, racist. He was a hard-core racist who wouldn't stop talking about how much black people scared him, how latinos were destroying this country, how Native Americans were lazy drunks, etc.

I think that, for him and other gay Republicans, their "community" isn't other LGBT people (definitely not the T-folk, at least). It's other people in their tribe of "real Americans." And they're willing to suppress their personal interest (gay rights) for the good of that group, since loyalty only goes up in authoritarian structures.

Personally, I don't consider myself a "single-issue voter" either. I don't think any gay person who votes does, and that's the worst part of their libel that probably stems from their delusions that they'll be protected by the Republican aristocracy.

And I think health care is an extremely important issue (moreso than marriage, DADT, or hate crimes legislation)! But McCain's health care plan would destroy our current system of employer-based health care and replace it with "Just don't get sick."

There are times to support LGBT friendly Republicans.

This is not one of those times and John McCain is not LGBT friendly.

Great article.

I've felt this way for the black gay republicans I've had the displeasure of crossing paths with -- though, while trying to understand their POV, suppressing the inclination to leap across the table to strangle and/or bludgeon gives me a massive migraine.

So for the health of all concerned I try to avoid them.

Reformed Ascetic | November 4, 2008 5:19 PM

Frankly I have trouble with most of the Republican platform (especially as it has developed into the neocon/fundamentalist party) and have trouble understanding why anyone other than a CEO receiving corporate welfare would back the Republican party.

The Republican party has definitely tried to portray itself as the party of God for many years now, and successfully. Limbaugh and such have been pretty open that they consider themselves as sending out "subtle" psychological signals that Republicanism is machoism. The party itself says both these tactics have been very successful, but I hate to reduce other individuals choice to disagree with me to such simplistic levels.

There are truths within the Republican party and I can understand someone wanting to support those truths.

However, I am also a values voter. If I found out someone was a member of the KKK or the Nazi party, I wouldn't vote for them regardless of how well they represented my political positions. Everyone gets to run for office if they desire, but for me to consider voting for them requires that they pass a test of certain minimum fundamentals before I consider their positions. If they are demonstrating before even obtaining office that they have no intention of representing their entire constituency, I consider them unfit for office.

I understand LGBT Republicans wanting to transform the party from the inside. Not too long ago we were all in that position -to a lesser degree we still are. I, personally, am not certain that it is the best strategy, but I understand.

I understand feeling conflicted if you, say, happen to believe in trickle down economics (although I feel forced to point out that it has failed at every attempt in American history).

But, for example, would any reasonable person vote for a candidate who supported anti-miscegeny laws? And I find it hard to accept that people within our community can't find that comparison very clear.