In an email sent to university students on March 18, UC Police Department Captain Karen Patterson described the attack. "The victims were walking home when one of the victims stopped to talk to the suspects, who were friends from high school. Upon hearing that the other victim was a homosexual, the suspects became aggressive and attacked both individuals."

Sadly, our information about the attack and the condition of the victims is limited because both the UC Police Department and the local mainstream media have seemed reluctant to inform the public about this crime.

Before the police released any information about the attack to the student community at the University of Cincinnati, and before any local news station gave a report on the alleged crimes, the crime first came to the attention of local activists when it was included as a minor point in a fundraising email from the Human Rights Campaign. Confused about how such a detail might make its way into a fundraising letter but not onto the nightly news, Barry Floore of QueerCincinnati.com began gathering information with the assistance of other local bloggers and students at the University of Cincinnati.

Jamie Royce of the blog Stuff Queer People Need to Know and Donald Caster of Cincinnati Blog have searched court records to identify the alleged perpetrators of the attack as 19-year-old Ethan Kirkwood and 20-year-old Matthew Kafagolis. Kirkwood's identification has been confirmed by a local news desk summarizing Kirkwood's arraignment as "Kirkwood attacked a man for being homosexual. Kirkwood then punched and kicked a friend of the victim who was trying to defend him." Both Kirkwood and Kafagolis have been charged with felonious assault, although other news sources suggest that police are still in search of the suspects and the email report from Captain Patterson references three, not two, suspects. If there is a third attacker, he has not been identified to the community nor is there word on what charges, if any, he may be facing. Kirkwood faces a grand jury on March 20 and Kafagolis on March 23.

The victims of this attack have asked that their names not be published, but reportedly are doing well following the assault.

It's only since the case caught the attention of local queer bloggers that information has begun to become forthcoming. Both the UCPD and the local mainstream media have seemed reluctant to inform the public about this crime until they were virtually forced to action.

Floore contacted local news stations asking why there was no coverage. He writes:

A snoop inside of one of the news offices gave us this heads up on why it has not been covered: neither have been charged with a hate crime, and, therefore, reporting it as such would be illegal. ... Hence, it's "just another assault."

Although Cincinnati has passed hate crime legislation inclusive of sexual orientation (but not gender identity), it appears to only be applicable in misdemeanor offenses, meanwhile Ohio state law doesn't include any hate crime legislation that recognizes sexual orientation or gender identity as suspect classes. Needless to say, confusion reigns. Why doesn't the local hate crime enhancement apply in what seems an obvious case of bias-motivated crime? What good does a city-wide ordinance do if the bulk of the criminal code is set at the state level? Why hasn't Ohio joined with the majority of other states (32) who recognize sexual orientation in the hate crime provisions or the growing number (11) who recognize gender identity?

Regardless, the dismissal of the case as "just another assault" when all the available information clearly indicates that sexual orientation was the primary motivating cause of this attack is insulting and indicative of the local media's disinterest in covering queer issues. As all of us know, the media has never been shy to report a story (if it suits their audience) by saying, "news tonight of an attack that some are saying should be considered a hate crime because the victim was attacked for being gay." No legal conundrum there, plus a chance to scoop up some ratings by bringing on the controversy around whether or not Ohio should pass a hate crimes bill.

Only after bloggers like Floore and Royce began their investigations, and several UC students complained to the administration, the UC Police Department finally sent out an email to students about the attack. Asks Royce:

And let's see, the assaults happened on March 6, and 12 days later they are just now getting around to telling us? And this was only after an outcry from several students to the administration that something actually got sent out (because they send out notices via e-mail about all major crime on UC property and around UC to students).

Royce also wonders why the charges against the men don't include an additional misdemeanor of criminal intimidation, which would be included under the local city-wide hate crime code. In response to the apparent lack of concern, several UC students who recently launched the Cincinnati Guerilla Queer Bar project called for a protest at the location of the alleged crime. Some ____(watch Barry's twitter feed for the #) people, including students and neighborhood community members, turned out to raise their voices against the silence and the apparent ineffectiveness of our hate crime laws.

It may have taken police and local media 12 days to acknowledge the attack, by utilizing the online tools of the past year's revitalized grassroots activism, such as Facebook, Twitter, blogs and email, organizers were able to organize a protest in less than 48 hours.

The persistence of local queer bloggers and the local community have finally shamed the mainstream media into acknowledging the crime and tonight's protest will only help to draw attention to the lack of statewide hate crime laws. If there is ever a lesson to be learned from physical attacks we receive simply because of our sexual orientation or gender identity, in this case, the lesson is that we cannot rely on police and media to draw attention to the violence we endure. Throughout many parts of the country, we are still on our own to raise our voices and make our fight heard.

---

"Did you see that fag?" local writer/blogger and photographer, Montgomery Maxton and I heard as we walked away from the protest. "Dude, they're gay."

Monty and I walked up to the protest on the corner of Clifton and Calhoun around 5:10pm as yet unsure of the outcome. Both of us admitted that, though potentially powerful, the ability of social media sources like Facebook and local bloggers was sometimes unpredictable. The e-mail had circulated a dozen times in the last 24 hours, us local bloggers were getting hits from Google searches of the incident right and left, four Facebook mass mailings had gone out, and there had more than a few text bombs from friends and acquaintances.

That said, this was an event planned in less than 24 hours with almost no logistical no-how or consultation with local organizations, the city, or the police. And it was being driven by social media.

"This could go either way," was our two-man consensus.

We needed a pitstop for coffee on the way, and we dropped in a coffee shop. We were among family from the moment we entered the door. People were talking about the protest, asking the local barista if he was going -- "I get off at 6:15," he said, "I hope it's still going on. I'll text you." I jumped into the conversation.

Around the corner, the crowd was growing alongside a smaller anti-war protest. The media was there. We counted three, possibly four, television news stations, and I was approached by two local newspapers for interviews. Some people, mistakenly, believed it was my baby and I had organized it simply because I had promoted it.

By the time the rally started walking, which is technically illegal without a parade permit but the local police said and did nothing except move alongside the crowd, there were well over 200 people there. The average age? Probably around 21, yet there were notable locals involved. Representatives from PFLAG, the Gay and Lesbian Community Center, and a few local rights group popped in, some with signs, to show their support.

When we made it to the corner of Clifton Avenue and Martin Luther King, Jr., we took up an entire street corner. Montgomery and I, noting that this would go on much longer than 6:30pm decided we would make our graceful exit.

It could have gone either way. It could have been violent, but it turned out peaceful. It could have been a real downer, but it turned out to be thrilling. It could have been dead, but it turned out to be busy. There could have been counterprotesters, hate mongers, pie throwers, aggressive attackers... there could have been anything.

But there wasn't.

There was only a crowd of 250 or so gay people, mostly students, asking that people recognize a hate crime occurred, and that it was important that we remember that violence against LGBT folk still exists. Cars honked, people joined, and couples pulled over to ask insightful, intelligent questions and show their support.

In an age where we are inundated with media and social connections, I am proud of my little community did more than post angry comments on my blog and curse the name of the attackers.

And the commentary of the young guys who called us all fags as we walked away -- Montgomery and I pulled aside to let them pass -- tells us one thing: there's a lot more work to be done. There's room, I think, for the hard work as well as the rallies and the Facebooking. It all matters; it is all equal.

Congratulations, Cincinnati, you always have the capability to amaze me. Thank you for honking, and thank you for cheering.