Questions Congress Should Have Asked AIG CEO Edward Liddy
Filed by: Storm Bear
March 25, 2009 1:35 PM
click to enlarge
Yes there were some tough questions and accusations thrown at AIG but they were all formulated for the best play during their next campaign, not getting to the bottom of the debacle.
First of all, I want to know what we need to do to start getting rid of these guys. The severance question is still an unknown. I am pretty sure all these guys have massive golden parachutes that are outlined in bullet-proof executive compensation contracts. I am also pretty sure these severance packages will all run into the millions... just like the bonuses.
I bet the Republicans are glad the AIG meme is moving off the table this week, this will allow them to get back to their tax cut theology.
Share
Like what you read? Subscribe to The Bilerico Project by Email.
Want others to read it too? Use the buttons and links here to share this entry with others. (Move your cursor over a button or link to learn more about it.)
1 Comment
« GLAAD Media Awards contest winners | Home | Scalia is homophobic »
I disagree with needing to get rid of Ed Liddy. He is not the one that ran the company into the ground. He was the one brought in by the government after they took it over. He's only getting pay $1 a year so that is why you are not seeing them ask those questions. So I guess contracts mean nothing to people. Hope any one who feels the same thinks long and hard about it void any contract they have.
Jarad | March 27, 2009 7:32 PM
Reply to this comment