Father Tony

The Gay Crusaders Are Hesitant

Filed By Father Tony | August 11, 2009 12:00 PM | comments

Filed in: The Movement
Tags: Cleve Jones, crusade against the gays, March on Washington

I am not sure if I am remembering 1993 or 1996 in the current edition of the South Florida Blade, but I do remember having a hellaciously great time. Here's my take on DC march:

In "The Lion In Winter," Kate Hepburn as Eleanor of Aquitaine says "I made Louis take me on Crusade. I dressed my women as Amazons and we rode bare-breasted halfway to Damascus. Louis had a seizure and I damn near died of windburn . . . but the troops were dazzled."

Our various gay marches and demonstrations and virally generated instant activism are the new Crusades, but there was a time, not too long ago, when the crusading urge meant going to Washington DC. Recently, the crowned and Arthurian Cleve Jones proclaimed a new crusade when he announced an October convening in DC to coincide with National Coming Out Day.

The reaction of the gay Knights of the Round Table (our prominent gay bloggers, political insiders, journalists and activists) was not quite what the king had hoped for. They question the impact of such an exertion at a time of limited resources. They wonder if local smaller efforts might not be more effective. They won't admit it, but many of them are loathe to support an event not of their own devising.

Like cardinals entering a conclave, none will admit to a desire to be crowned LGBT leader of America while quietly scuttling the work of the competition. They begin to whisper their suspicions that the strategies suggested by our venerable gay royalty are dated and tired and outmoded. Some, loyalists to the death, say that if we do not all rally behind the king and stand with him in DC, we will all suffer when this crusade flops due to poor attendance.

Let me tell you how marching on Washington in 1996 dazzled me. I remember the collective euphoria of the swarm--realizing that the city was in our possession, and the shock and awe of converting it to gay. I remember gliding up the subway escalator into a mobbed Dupont Circle where men like Olympic judges gave forth with applause for each entrance. I remember being perched in a small window of the upstairs level of the Eagle, sprinkling beer on the tightly packed shirtless assemblage on the deck below. I remember crying upon locating lost friends stitched into the Quilt covering the Mall. I remember the hilarity of the sauna of the YMCA wherein we all realized that we who were gay held sway. (The one straight fellow, cringing in the corner farthest from the door, anxiously weighed the merits of climbing over the intertwined revelers to escape rather than pass out from the heat.) I remember wondering if our friend Pablo, who had struggled to live long enough to make this trip, would be well enough to join the march. He was not, but he was happily surrounded by friends while watching the marchers pass below the window of his hotel room.

I do not remember any of the speeches or the names of the organizers or the size of the crowd. I do not know how we may or may not have changed the minds of straight America at home and watching us on television. I do not know how much political ground we gained by that show of force. I do know that I am terrifically glad I was there.

Thirteen years have passed since that march, and now, whenever I hear that gay chant "We're Here! We're queer! Get used to it!", I also hear Lisa Simpson's rejoinder "You do this every year! We are used to it!". Maybe the crusades have lost their dazzle. Maybe the newest generation of gays will go to Washington and not have the type of defining moment and memory I hold dear. Maybe no one watching will be impressed.

The third chapter of the biblical Book of Ecclesiates reminds us that everything has its season. War, peace, love and hate. But what are we to make of this awkward time in which we find ourselves? Do we book our flights, and make the grand old-school gesture one more time? Do we focus on digital activism at the expense of physical activism? Do we make mini-swarms locally and magnify them via the net? Will Facebooking rather than hotel booking our struggle for equality bring better results?

With one caution, I am willing to let the gay Knights among us decide this issue. If you trash this march on Washington, you had better be ready with an alternative that is not only more efficient but one that is equally enjoyable.


Recent Entries Filed under The Movement:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


"Maybe the newest generation of gays will go to Washington and not have the type of defining moment and memory I hold dear."

I'm hoping to. That's why I'm going.

"If you trash this march on Washington, you had better be ready with an alternative that is not only more efficient but one that is equally enjoyable."

Thank you! I'm so tired of the negativity. Fine, you don't want to go? Don't. Don't trash this for me and other people still deciding whether to go or not.

Wow, Padre that has been more useful to me than all of the pissy haggling of this thing that I have seen. I am amazed and I have been constantly trying to rethink this thing again and again and now suddenly it is very, very clear to me.
I won't complain about it and maybe I'll go myself.

I truly believe that we have arrived at a point where there is enough comfort amongst LGBT's and a lack of motivated radicalism that we will have a huge difficulty sustaining a movement beyond the internet.

We cfould win the battle for our rights through a series of repated protests and events designed to inconvienience our enemies, hit and run protests, but we don't do it.

We could force the Mormons to back off by having a crowd showup every time a temple is holding a wedding, so they have to close the gates. We could have hit and run kiss ins outside of Catholic Churches that lend their resources to continuing bigotry against us...sooner or later, the Churches would tier of paying the price of opposing us.

But we don't.

We could have out rights, if not now, then soon, but we won't.

You're exactly right MH, but why don't we do those very effective things?

tom.brown@bilerico.com | August 12, 2009 6:30 AM

Father Tony's closing comment unfortunately says it all -- gay activism has to be "enjoyable." I thought the point of a rally is to deliver a political message, not to have a big party. Of course, a party is always fun, but does it accomplish anything? If anything, it will draw out a counter-protest by the prayer-warrior goons, and the mainstream media will give equal exposure to both sides, in their obsession with "balance." If young gays really feel they must go to Washington to "be there or be square," I would suggest they try the tactics of Frank Kameny and the Mattachine Society of days of yore -- i.e. put on business suits and having a march, or even a silent vigil, with lots of emphasis on decorum, non-obscene placards, and seriousness of purpose. Father Tony could even don his Roman collar for the occasion. In other words, present an image that will be completely different from the raucous Pride parties the straight world has come to expect. But after they disperse from the Mall, the marchers can head back to the Y or the disco, shuck their suits and do whatever they need to do to make the weekend "enjoyable."

Robert Ganshorn Robert Ganshorn | August 12, 2009 9:05 AM

Tom, another quote from "The Lion in Winter" delivered by Kate Hepburn was to the king of France who was the son of her first husband Louis:

"I was told you were impressive for a boy of seventeen, but I had no idea how impressive."

It is time to drop the "shock" tactics that bring us ridicule and emphasize our few differences with most people of a liberal bent. It is time for us to stop being the butt of a joke on the evening news! Emphasize the common interests you share and that religion has no place in a secular democracy.

Remember that you are representing others in a Civil Rights demonstration, not a circus contest of kink that is neither Gay or Hetero specific. In short, no BDSM because heteros do that too. It is not a GLBT issue. It is as inflammatory as showing up at a Black Church with a burning cross for the good it does us.

Remember that the prominent flag should be the stars and stripes to underscore that Americans are living in a state of inequality! Party back at home so that the police/or media will not have the ability to find someone to arrest for any reason or exploit for the benefit of Fox News.