Amy Hunter

Lessons for the marginalized

Filed By Amy Hunter | November 02, 2009 1:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Living, Media, Politics, Transgender & Intersex
Tags: Amy Hunter, Jon Hoadley, Kalamazoo, LGBT civil rights, Mara Keisling, One Kalamzoo

Kalamazoo will vote tomorrow.

Should the city reinstate and keep on the books a transgender inclusive non-discrimination ordinance? Nearly all of these local initiatives ultimately stand or fall on two issues, "reverse discrimination", leveled at L,G,B and T and the infamous "bathroom issue" singling out the transgender community for demonization.

While Kalamazoo got off to a potentially harmful start three years ago by not including a trans-person in the process of negotiating language with the city, once alerted to the oversight, Kalamazoo Alliance for Equality (KAFE) quickly embraced the transgender community and made the hard decision of choosing unity over safety. Then, with a trans-person as a co-chair, KAFE made the equally risky decision to strengthen the language of the ordinance to be much more trans-affirmative.

I clearly remember the meeting when I asked the question: "What's it going to be, all of us or none of us?" The next three or four minutes of silence were absolutely deafening.

It was a huge turning point. I think we all realized in those few moments that we had allowed ourselves to shift along with the political ground we stood on. Just as then candidate Obama was promising "an inclusive ENDA--or he would not sign it", we had laid down the basic premise from which we could not walk away. It was all of us or, potentially, none of us.

Clearly, however, disparity between our thinking, the media, and to a lesser extent, the community exists. The opposition to ordinance #1856 gleefully jumped on the "bathroom issue". Quickly the outcry of "men in dresses" invading women's privacy and endangering children went up. The media, which was somewhat less than impartial, characterized the debate as strictly moral and religious in nature. The supportive community took a "discrimination in any form is wrong" stance. What did not transpire was any effort to educate both sides of the debate about what being transgender really is.

There is some logic behind this. It is axiomatic in a campaign setting that you never give your opponent free media and furthermore, efforts to dispel myths typically backfire. While substantively this may be true, doctrine can easily slip into dogma without careful consideration of the situation at hand. In this case, it is true that facts and education are not going to convert the "true believer", they are already steeped in dogma and consequently unmovable.

We forget however that changing your opponents mind is not the aim. Providing accurate and compelling information to the uninformed voter with which to make a reasonable decision should be the goal. We didn't do it. In fact, way back in April, I was discouraged by one of our national partners from doing interviews for a feature article in the local newspaper. The reasoning for this? We don't want to give our potential opponents any ammunition.

We were making choices based on dogma before the campaign had become a campaign. I did the interview and it turned out to be a very well balanced story that was subsequently picked up by the AP and showed up in large papers nationwide.

Just a couple of nights ago the local CBS affiliate ran two stories: One about living through transition - a married couple with two delightful girls and the husband in transition along with some highly edited commentary from a local psychologist. The other; a standard "Marci Bowers" story, (Only this one features Dr. Christine McGinn from Philadelphia) following two patients through gender confirmation surgery. Pretty standard stuff, nothing offensive or too far off the mark. The problem I have is that there needs to be a ten-fold increase in coverage of trans-people, trans-issues, etc, if what we are fighting is a battle of ignorance borne fear.

Kalamazoo has done almost everything right with regard to transgender participation in the process. I sat on the committee that hired our campaign manager, Jon Hoadley, and later became Director of Operations for One Kalamazoo. A trans-man is our field director, a wonderfully energetic gender non-conforming person handles student activities coordination and the steering committee has a trans-man member.

It would be a pressing endeavor to find another campaign with as many highly placed transgender people; yet, our presence has been, largely ignored by the press and there was no organized push from One Kalamazoo to change that paradigm. The implications of this go far beyond Kalamazoo. If we, as transpersons don't lobby hard for ourselves at the local level, we risk being relegated to the back burner time and again with no control over the messaging (or lack of it) surrounding us.

This has consequences for the transgender community in the near term, particularly in an election setting such as here in Kalamazoo. More importantly, it is from the small constituent local initiatives that the national LGBT equality movement will garner most of its strength and credibility in the future. "Flyover country" is no longer a pejorative descriptor.

The internal politics of our movement can be tumultuous at best. It is far past time to put these childish things aside. All of us must insist on parity for each other. Reach out to our voters on a level playing field. Offer them accurate, timely, and compelling information. Expend our energies on breaking the establishment barriers that prevent us from disseminating that information.

If we leave our egos out of the equation and honor the process instead, constantly evaluate our motives, trust ourselves, trust one another and above all--the voters, we have a much better chance of not falling prey to our own dogma. If we can do that, then win or lose, we will know that we have lived what we say we believe.


Recent Entries Filed under Media:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


Angela Brightfeather | November 2, 2009 3:33 PM

Amy,

You have said a lot in this piece that is both true and impressive. But what sticks in my mind is that Kalamazoo is a micro example of "every day" town and city in America, where Transgender people need to realize a few things.

First that Transgender does not equal "people in transition" and secondly, that no matter what variety of Transgender person you are, the only solution is to be more publicly out and fighting for your rights and the hinge pin for that is the protection of your ability to sustain that, or some kind of security, which of course, the Transgender community has never had.

The old transgender illusion of our youth, of being able to take a pill and waking up the next morning as the person you wish to be gender wise, has had that bubble burst by the fact that actually taking certain pills every day does allow us to wake up, eventually, in the gender of our deepest need. But that fact still does not help us because the trade off has been, our right to be free and open about who we are now, without getting the shit kicked out of us or losing our ability to support ourselves.

Your fight in one corner of America, reflects the "bathroom issue" fights in evry corner of America.

Until we as Trans people are ready to face the fact that in order to go to the bathroom, we first have to visit a surgeon and initiate ourselves into another sex, or simply find a place to pee in the woods or the parking lot without creating a fuss, the fight will never begin to end.

Public restrooms are onwed by the public. All of the public. There is no division and should never be any division.

A better starting point might be to lobby to outlaw the use of urinals in rest rooms so that they all look the same, with stalls and doors that close and lock. That might go a lot farther than trying to fight people who insist that male and female excrement needs to be kept separate. As a plumber, I can tell you for a fact, that it all goes to the same place. Would this be "rest room incrementalism"?

So there you have it. Pass ENDA to protect our jobs. Then agree that we are all equal as Transgender people. Then everyone come out and start to have bathroom sit in's and see how fast that they try to pass laws defining the use of public restrooms, owned by everyone. Then lets take that to the Supreme Court and let them try to define what a woman and a man is. It's the only way that this whole ridiculous arguement about rest rooms is going to dissapear. It has obvioulsy come to the point when we are going to have to drag them through the excrement of defining their own bigotry and social separatism, before they allow people to use any public rest room that they choose.

Hi Angela,
Thanks for commenting. Your musings are always very well considered and thoughtful. I enjoy receiving them.
----a

Amy, this is WONDERFUL! You've been an amazing voice for the Kalamazoo community! I hope that you continue to lead on equality issues in the future!

Good luck today! I know you're busy working your butt off and not reading blog comments, but I'm sending you energy, strength and determination.