We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.
The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.
These are fascinating. The depth and nature of the commentary that screams into my head on seeing the second through fourth is actually broader than that of the first -- but the first is so uniformly "wrong" by today's standards that I may be losing some of what I'd see in serious contemplation.
Although I could see that first one being made now, put up on an obscure webpage no one will look at, and come back to haunt the politician who made it in several year. Some people still think that's hilarious.
Leave a comment
We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.
The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.
oh, wow. lol
These are fascinating. The depth and nature of the commentary that screams into my head on seeing the second through fourth is actually broader than that of the first -- but the first is so uniformly "wrong" by today's standards that I may be losing some of what I'd see in serious contemplation.
Although I could see that first one being made now, put up on an obscure webpage no one will look at, and come back to haunt the politician who made it in several year. Some people still think that's hilarious.