Patricia Nell Warren

Vancouver: TV Ratings R Us

Filed By Patricia Nell Warren | February 24, 2010 9:30 AM | comments

Filed in: Entertainment, Media
Tags: gay athletes, Vancouver, Winter Olympics

The Winter Games are made to order for TV ratings. Day before yesterday, two luscious and photogenic young couples, Canada and U.S.A., duked it out for the gold, while U.S.A. and Russia slugged over the bronze. Re the win, judging looked to be spot on -- it was suspect only where the Russians squeaked into 3rd despite their hideous costumes and weak performance.

Next morning, the Star-Ledger's Alan Sepinwall analyzed the ratings: "Through Saturday night, NBC's prime-time coverage has averaged 26.3 million viewers a night. That's way up from the 20.6 million for the 2006 Torino Games."

Sepinwall continues: "One piece of research suggested that half of all Americans had watched at least some of the games over the first week. ...Hit shows like '24,' 'Lost' and 'Grey's Anatomy' have seen their numbers go down .... And last Wednesday, NBC's coverage drew more than 30 million viewers to only 18.6 for 'American Idol.'"

So -- why are Americans watching so avidly, after previous Games showed a slackening of interest in these commercially overblown events?

Vancouver has been dubbed "the feel-good Olympics." Feel good for Americans, that is. Our sports stars are bringing home the Canadian bacon -- not only a bobsled full of medals, but a whole mountain-range of human-interest stories, thanks to broadcast strategy that aims to deliver human-interest stories spotlighting Americans. NBC couldn't have done better if it had been able to script every single sports result. As it was, we viewers get the tears, fears and jeers, the happy faces singing national anthems, and hip sports fashions that would look good on the red carpet.

So why are so many Americans suddenly so avid for sports stories? Could it have anything to do with how bad we've felt about our country for the last few years? Can that heap of medals (25 of them by this morning) fill that vast cavity growing in our global prestige? Can the wins of our alpine ski team be a momentary substitute for victory in Afghanistan and Iraq? Is the drama around Lindsey Vonn's injury a diversion from our politicians' refusal to improve healthcare? For a few more days, can American TV viewers escape into an illusion that things aren't really as bad as they really are?

Ironically, the personal reality of the athletes themselves -- their very real struggles with winning and losing, which deserve the ultimate respect -- is happening on a radically different plane from the soap opera that media policy-makers are making up as they go along.

I'd love to see a ratings breakdown on LGBT American viewers, as we wonder how many more of us are competing behind that feel-good facade -- that pretty picture where God's in his heaven, gays are in the closet where they belong, and all's right with the world.


This was also posted at

Recent Entries Filed under Media:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

They were discussing this on NPR this morning, and the commentator was of the opinion that, really, it all comes down to some good news for a change. Take the women's ski event: everyone knew by early afternoon that Vonn had won the gold, but everyone still tuned in to see it happen and rejoice in her accomplishment, long after the event happened.

Given all the crap in the news these days, I'm not surprised to see the ratings through the roof on this. It's kinda hard to be politically partisian when your hockey team is winning... although I'm sure someone somewhere will try. :)

Jerame and I have been talking about how much we've been watching curling of all things. J actually went and looked up the rules and scoring so he could explain it to me while we watched.

It made a world of difference, but I still think scoring it my way would have been more interesting. I kept asking when they had to take a piece of clothing off and Jerame kept patiently explaining that it's not "strip curling."

I've got my eye on the Swedish curling team though. I've heard about the Swedes and I've got my hopes up. *grins*

Rick Elliott | February 25, 2010 1:45 AM

Contemplating the Olympics during a futile war, an observation:
--Most of the athletes probably couldn't pass the physical to enter one of the armed forces. Sport injuries would rule them out.

Actually, U.S. Army statistics show that 75 percent of military-age young people are ineligible to serve in uniform because they are overweight, or can't pass entrance exams, or had run-ins with the law.

I'd say that, where fitness is concerned, the Olympic athletes can probably do better than our kids on military eligibility.

Can that heap of medals (25 of them by this morning) fill that vast cavity growing in our global prestige?

That's probably part of it.

Also more people who are unemployed means that more will be able to watch daytime tv.