Final briefs were filed in the Prop 8 trial, and we also found out that, despite the judge's suggestion otherwise, closing arguments won't be televised. You can read more about Olson and Boies's arguments at Karen's place, which are really just a summary of arguments they've been making all along.
But this stood out from the San Jose Mercury News about the homophobes' arguments:
In papers filed late Friday, lawyers for the sponsors of California's gay marriage ban offered new twists on their claim that allowing gay men and lesbians to wed could undermine man-woman unions.
The potential harms they cited included giving bisexuals a legal basis for pursuing group marriages and unmarried fathers an incentive to abandon their children.
Lawyers for gay marriage supporters argued that no evidence existed to back those claims.
I love the dry way the Mercury News puts it since it makes the other side sound positively insane.