Keri Renault

Will Health Care Reform Resuscitate ENDA?

Filed By Keri Renault | March 19, 2010 12:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Politics, Politics, Transgender & Intersex
Tags: Congressional Budget Office, ENDA, gender identity, health care reform, NCTE, Reconciliation, Tea Party, transgender

Transgender advocates and allies across America gathered Tuesday on Capitol Hill in support of ENDA while opponents of Health Care Reform sounded an entirely different alarm. Both may see action as early as Sunday.

The ENDA support coalition was organized by the National Center for Transgender Equality, NCTE, as part of its National Policy Forum, "Moving Forward Together." More than 100 Congressional offices were lobbied to support a gender-identity inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act.

Workplace protections for sexual orientation and gender identity have been aruged and denied since first proposed in 1994.

Likewise, ultra-conservative Tea Partiers mobilized by a "Red Alert" swarmed Congressional and Senate buildings albeit in far superior numbers Tuesday. Their agenda was straightforward. Defeat healthcare reform at any cost with an uncompromising "Say No" message of fiscal gloom and doom.

During my three Congressional meetings on behalf of ENDA Tuesday a common theme emerged. The protracted partisan struggle for Health Care Reform was cited as the #1 reason vote-worthy legislation like ENDA has been tabled.

The "Party of No" - much like their feisty "Just Say No" constituents - has wreaked diversionary havoc aimed to impede the legislative process for more than a year. Strong-arm, bully tactics escalated to Town Hall scream-a-thons last summer.

Legislative business in the District of Columbia has been slowed to a nerve-wracking crawl ever since. The body of evidence is staggering. A backlog of almost 290 bills is pending in Congress. Movement of ENDA through Congressional committee is grounded by the same gridlock.

The good news is Thursday's release of the 10-year economic impact of HR 3590 and the "reconciliation" proposal on Health Care Reform. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that enacting both pieces of legislation would produce a net reduction in the Federal deficit of $138 billion from 2010-2019. It's precisely the shot in the arm Health Care Reform proponents and the Obama administration have long been seeking.

The federal deficit reducing outcome of Health Care Reform serves several functions. The money-saving news will to some degree mute fiscal conservative mouthpieces. If nothing else it derails the conservative argument of runaway government spending on Health Care.

More important, the CBO release offers a credible rationale for moderate Democrats to climb aboard Health Care Reform.The result could be a vote on Health Care Reform by Sunday. A favorable vote in turn would clear the runway for takeoff of many long grounded bills---like ENDA.


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


Let's hope something revives ENDA - and quick!

SkepticalCicada | March 20, 2010 7:31 AM

ENDA is dead because the Senate will not approve legislation regulating transitions and restrooms. Dispensing with health care reform will not change that fact. ENDA is dead.

BTW, Congress has been considering sexual orientation employment discrimination legislation since 1974, not 1994, and it has been considering gender identity employment discrimination legislation since 2006, not 1994. Pretending the two issues are the same, have the same history, and have achieved the same level of support does not make it so.

I have to wonder even if health care is moved forward, have the Democrats used too much of their political capital to get much else done? Assuming of course they really wish to do anything that is, other than garner sound bites for the folks back home. It is an election year again after all.