Adam Bink

All hands on deck

Filed By Adam Bink | May 24, 2010 3:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Politics
Tags: Don't Ask Don't Tell

I spent a lot of time over the past few days talking about repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell to both strongly political friends as well as apolitical friends of mine, LGBT and straight. The comment I heard most often was when is the President going to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell? There is still this misconception out there that because the policy was adopted and announced by the Clinton Administration, that Obama simply has the power here. Not so. It has since been codified into law and takes an act of Congress to repeal it.

So while the President has a role in this, not only is it incorrect to focus on the Administration and wait for action, but I've concluded by this point that we can't count on the Administration lifting a finger to help. We have to get this done the old-fashioned way: contacting Congress ourselves. Gen. Shaliskhavili did his part with a well-worded op-ed in the WaPo this weekend. Let's take the ball and run with it.

On Thursday, the Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a vote on repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell. The House is also expected to vote late this week after the SASC votes. If we lose this vote, it will be a significant blow even if repeal passes in the House. Or, put another way, we simply cannot afford to lose this vote.

As Dr. Weiss wrote last week, ENDA is already hanging by a thread. We are on the razor's edge of seeing repeal of DADT going the same way, but we are also on the cusp of winning. The Congressional switchboard is 202-224-3121, and it's time to pick up the phone and ask your members to support repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell.

Normally, "call your members" isn't an ask I like to make. Here at Bilerico Project courtesy of Dr. Weiss and at my home blog, OpenLeft.com, we have targets. And we do- if you are a constituent of Sens. Bayh, Brown (MA), Byrd, Nelson (FL) or Webb, they are the swing votes in committee and have been for over a month. It is especially important that you call, and ask friends who are constituents to call.

But having heard many things about the mood up there on Capitol Hill, there are so many nominally supportive members worried about this fall's election that many would rather not see a vote at all, or will even vote against it. It's just one of those environments that even if you have someone who has said they are a supporter, if they aren't a supporter of the Kirsten Gillibrand or Barney Frank caliber, it's good to drop them a line and ask them to support repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell this week. It's game time, my friends, as SLDN's Aubrey Sarvis put it:

"This is our 'all hands on deck' moment," said Aubrey Sarvis, executive director for SLDN. "For repeal to succeed, it is critical that all proponents for full repeal weigh in now, including the White House. We are only a few days away from this historic vote."

Sarvis told The Advocate that key offices on the Hill had reached out to the organization to get the message out. "We are hearing from the Hill that proponents of repeal need to be heard louder and clearer that they support a vote for repeal next week."

The one other thing I want to say is that it's easy to talk about the Obama administration and their lack of action on this issue. I've pushed back a lot on their failures at OpenLeft. But I just don't care anymore, and neither should you. Why? Because it will feel a lot to better to win those last few votes and pass repeal in the face of the Obama administration sitting on the sidelines and even running interference in the form of the Pentagon review and the Gates letter. If you're angry at the Obama administration - and I am, too - there's no better way than sticking it to Gates by passing a repeal vote in the face of his opposition. You can do that by calling your members.

Plus, no one wants to be sitting at the end of this week, watching repeal of DADT fail in committee, and wishing they had spent more time calling their members and asking friends to instead of writing about how the Obama administration isn't helping.

So it's in our hands, friends. If you have 5 minutes, make a few calls. If you have 10 minutes, drop a line to your friends/family/colleagues who are constituents of Sens. Bayh, Brown (MA), Byrd, Nelson (FL) or Webb, and ask them to make a call. The number is 202-224-3121, or all the Senators's individual contact information is here, and House members are here. Servicemembers United is asking you to report back on Facebook what your members said, which you can do here.

Please take a second and call.


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


I curious, which members of Congress do you believe are changeable?

We can't currently pass anything LGBT-related in the US Senate, unless we hold defense spending hostage.

So, if we're going to lobby politicians, which ones are on-the-fence? If calls and emails matter, let's put them to the best use and pick the best potential targets. A list would be helpful.

"Here at Bilerico Project courtesy of Dr. Weiss and at my home blog, OpenLeft.com, we have targets. And we do- if you are a constituent of Sens. Bayh, Brown (MA), Byrd, Nelson (FL) or Webb, they are the swing votes in committee and have been for over a month."

Reading, Andrew, you may want to try it sometime.

I asked which Members of Congress were "changeable." Not which Senators were considered "targets."

Sen. Byrd is not changeable. He has said consideration of DADT repeal should "wait for the Pentagon study results."

Sen. Webb is not changeable. He has said consideration of DADT repeal should "wait for the Pentagon study results."

Sen. Bayh is not changeable. He has said consideration of DADT repeal should "wait for the Pentagon study results."

Sen. Nelson is not changeable. He has said consideration of DADT repeal should "wait for the Pentagon study results."

ALL of these Senators have been on the record supporting DADT. If you believe they are "changeable," please explain "why?"

Sen. Brown is still "unknown" so maybe he doesn't need to be "changed."

It's helpful if you actually read the question.

Might be changeable now that the Pentagon signed off on the deal. Or not. Bayh was always a douchenozzle that way.

The Pentagon hasn't "signed off" on the deal. With this Amendment (HRC Compromise) the authority to end DADT (the discrimination) is given over to the Pentagon and President. It's a lot like a "no" vote for repeal. So, maybe Bayh would support this charade of progress.

Sen. Scott Brown is now a "NO" on DADT repeal.

http://weeklystandard.com/blogs/scott-brown-no-and-collins-yes-dadt-repeal

Susan Collins is a "YES" where most of us already had her.

We've lost Nelson (Nebraska) and Brown (Massachusetts) from the HRC "Six Senators." Evan Bayh is supposed to make a statement tomorrow.

It is telling that the AD embedded in this Article is:

Protect Dems in 2010
Help Keep the Senate Blue & Defend The President’s Agenda.
Act Now!

Webb has announced he will NOT support the compromised DADT (not really repeal) Repeal.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/25/869885/-Jim-Webb-to-oppose-repealing-Dont-Ask,-Dont-Tell

We can't get 60 Votes - even with this silly compromise.