Marriage doesn't make relationships more stable, a group of social
scientists in the UK found:
Parents who are cohabiting when their child is born are three times more likely to split up by the time their child is five than married parents (27% compared to 9%). However they are also typically younger, less well off, less likely to own their own homes, have fewer educational qualifications and are less likely to plan their pregnancies than married people. Once these differences between the two groups are accounted for, the difference in the likelihood of separation almost disappears (falling to 2 percentage points).
The IFS analysis shows that relationship stability is mainly determined not by marriage but by other factors such as age, education, occupation and income, and delaying and planning pregnancy. These factors are also influential in whether people choose to marry or not. So while married couples have more stable relationships than couples who cohabit, this is not because they are married, but because of the other characteristics they have that lead to marriage.
Prepare for all sorts of whining from the moral majority crowd about how this study was biased, doesn't apply to the US, yada yada yada, mainly because it doesn't fit neatly in with their values. Reality has a terrible leftwing bias, which is a great reason to just ignore it.







Leave a comment
We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.
The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.
LOL I love it, OMG "Reality has a terrible left wing bias...." Too funny. I almost dropped my new violin when I saw that. I know don't practice violin when you are reading.
I love that the study actually has information examining well beyond the surface. I hate it when a surface level announcement of findings in a study has no reflection of what the study actually says.
"Reality has a terrible leftwing bias"
As does the Word of God. Or so I've heard. :)
However, "Sometimes queers...assume that everything would be easier if they just had access to straight privilege" - I think this is true, actually. For any given queer person, chances are good that access to straight privilege, on top of whatever other privileges they already have access to, will probably make his or her life easier. Plus, the way you wrote that, it seemed like you were conflating "straight privilege" with "marriage". I know that you know they're not the same, so maybe I read you wrong?
How dare you challenge the moral stance for marriage, Alex. Won't you think of the children? We don't need to figure out what's actually best for them, we just need to keep them inline by shaming them about love, sex, and child birth.