Don Davis

Military Endorsements: Another Weird Christine O'Donnell Story

Filed By Don Davis | October 25, 2010 3:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Politics
Tags: Christine O'Donnell, Hatch Act, military, Myspace, Politcs, Social Media, US Army, US Marine Corps, US Navy

I have a ton of things on the desk at the moment, and I don't have odonnell2-748456.jpgthe time to really run out this story before Election Day, but I want to bring to your attention something very strange that I found on the 2008 "Christine O'Donnell for Senate" MySpace page.

The United States Marine Corps and the United States Army are "Christine O'Donnell for Senate" MySpace friends (or there are persons who have created United States Army and USMC MySpace pages that purport to be official that have "befriended" her candidacy). There's also a Navy page that appears to emanate from a US Navy recruiting office in California on her '08 campaign's "friends" list.

At a minimum, all of this would seem to be a combination of inappropriate behavior and poor management of social media; at worst, you have activity that is "some kind of unlawful," either on an administrative or civil level.

As of the evening of Saturday, October 23rd, right there in the middle of the second row of her friends, immediately below the National Republican Senatorial Committee and "Rush," are "Marine Corps," "U.S. Army," and "U.S. Navy."

Click on the Army page and the Marine page, and they appear to be official US military pages, with the full set of "enrichments" that you would expect on a professionally created page.

The Navy one is a bit different, starting with the address, which is clearly not as succinct, if you will, as the other two. It's also not as graphically rich, and it appears to be a lot more homemade.

If you look at the address, after the slash you see "nrselkgrove." It turns out NRS Elk Grove is a Navy Recruiting Station in Elk Grove, California, a Sacramento suburb. I called the phone number I found, and, sure enough, the phone message seems to confirm that this is correct.

I left a message identifying myself, explaining the situation, and offering the folks on the other end of the line a chance to contact me for comment. As of now that has not occurred.

I sent a message to the Marine Corps press folks asking for some kind of explanation a few days ago, they have also not responded as of this writing.

So what's the big deal?

Well, right off the bat, the Hatch Act says that federal executive branch employees cannot engage in politics while they're acting as federal employees, and this kind of looks like that, at least as far as the actions of the Navy recruiter who apparently created that web page are concerned.

The Naval Inspector General says that:

When acting in their official capacity, service members may not engage in activities that associate the Navy with any partisan political campaign or election, candidate, cause, or issue.

And that makes perfect sense; obviously we don't want members of the military services giving the impression that those services endorse or oppose specific candidates for public office. But the Navy recruiters' MySpace page befriending the Senate candidate's MySpace page surely creates that impression.

Of course, it is possible that someone who has nothing to do with the Navy created the page, and that's true of the Army and Marine pages as well. But if that were true, there are additional concerns we can easily see.

If the three services are totally and completely disassociated from those MySpace pages, then does the military have an issue with anyone at all creating "official" pages on their behalf and then doing things with the pages that the services would not be allowed to do? If they don't have an issue with it, don't you think they should?

Thanks to the experimental work of FNS Chief Social Media Correspondent Blitz Kreiger (who is an actual person with a nom de plume), we do know that the Army and Marines pages will "friend" anyone, automatically. To confirm that, visit the MySpace page of "Osama Sodomy Laden," who was able to "befriend" both the Army and Marines instantly.

It would appear, at an absolute minimum, that some kind of safeguard is needed so that NAMBLA, or Osama Sodomy Laden, or "Christine O'Donnell for Senate '08"doesn't put a huge chunk of the US military on their friends list.

Finally, it's possible that the various military services have policies galore to prevent this sort of thing from happening, but they are unaware of the existence of these MySpace pages. It would be kind of embarrassing, but it is possible.

It's possible that various military regulations, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Hatch Act, or a series of bad decisions relating to how you manage social media are implicated in the presence of the services as "friends" on the Senate Candidate's page. If not we have to consider another question: what happens if a disassociated third party uses your marks and logos to create a Web page that you're either unaware of or that you allow to exist, and that page is used in a manner that creates the appearance of impropriety?

Since I'm 0-2 when it comes to getting someone from the military to answer my questions when I ask them about it, I can't tell you exactly which explanation is correct, but obviously it's not a good thing when the appearance is created that the military supports specific candidates, and it's something that should be fixed as soon as possible.


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


I'm retired military and you are correct that the Hatch act restricts what the military and its members can, and can not do.

Neither the military or its members while in uniform can publicly endorse any political candidate, cause, law, regulation etc. and so on. To do so will raise the ire of the heavy brass who will then stomp your CO for not knocking that in to the enlisted's and Jr Officers heads.

>Most likely, Christine O'Donnell freinded the military branches on her own, or it was an automatic freinding.
>A USN Recruiting station in Califorina? Find out who there is from Deleware and thats the culprit.

>I've had a coworker get taken to mast for NJP because while in uniform he removed a sign from his yard that was placed there without his permission.
>I've had a coworker taken to courtsmartial for printing fliers for his favoriate political candidate. (that was well deserved, he actually asked for the courtsmartial and lost)

Yes, the DoD does need to look in to this directly and put it to a stop now before something really nasty happens.

you could not be more correct in this comment, on several levels, and i hope this does get spread around far enough to get some action started.

I think people should start asking the Senators in the Armed Services Sub-Committee about this one. I believe that is chaired by Senator Carl Levin (D) of Michigan.

i'm doing a follow-up that looks at how many members of the senate have this sort of endorsement situation themselves first; after that i would like to move on to the sort of follow-up you suggest.

Lots of people in the military are republicans who are pretty open about their political leanings but get mad if anyone to the left of them is. Wouldn't be surprised if this was more than an auto-friend-accept.

the fact that osama sodomy laden (which really should be the name of a band) was instantly "friended" by two of the sites suggests some sort of autofriending must be in play here, but that doesn't mean that folks on the military side might not be upset at all about being on the o'donnell page.

Don,

Off topic here, but I do hope you keep up your efforts to discuss STRATEGY for the LGBT Community. Nobody does and it is important.

i need to do more, but for this month the caf folks are "renting" me to do some social security work, which is why you're seeing so much of it all at once accompanied by a disclosure statement.