Terrance Heath

Crosshairs or Surveyor's Symbol? You Decide

Filed By Terrance Heath | January 11, 2011 5:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Politics
Tags: Arizona, Gabrielle Giffords, reload, retreat, Sarah Palin, shooting

OK. I have at least a couple of posts about the Tucson shooting that left six dead and Rep. Gabriel Gifford's in critical condition. I might even finish writing one of them before the story is no longer news. (But not before everything has been said.)

But I can't let this wait.

Look, if you're going to have the gall to put crosshairs in a political ad, have the guts to own up to it.

Palin's team, in particular, sought to put distance between the former Alaska governor and the case, insisting that an oft-cited "crosshairs" logo used on a Palin PAC website over Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' district was not in any way intended to look like gun sights.

The images on the map bore a resemblance to a surveyor's symbol, a Palin spokeswoman said Sunday, but Palin herself referred to it as a "'bullseye' icon" immediately after the election.

Seriously? What does this look like to you.

palin-crosshairs1.jpg

Crosshairs? Or "surveyor's symbol"?

And how does a surveyor's symbol tie in with the obvious message of the ad? In case there's any doubt, an image now scrubbed from Palin's PAC website makes it pretty clear.

diagnosis.jpg

"We've diagnosed the problem. Help us prescribe a solution." How do "surveyor's marks" help "prescribe a solution"?

More to the point, how does a surveyor "reload"?

The two did not discuss the fact that the image was immediately followed by Palin urging like-minded folks to "reload." Of course, everyone knows surveyors' equipment needs to be reloaded, too, right? Oh wait....

It's worth emphasizing that the website for Palin's political action committee was scrubbed yesterday, and offending materials related to Giffords and crosshairs were removed.

So, I have three related questions. The first is, if Palin's materials were entirely defensible, why scrub the website? Isn't this an implicit acknowledgement of an offense?

The second is, if the crosshairs were unrelated to guns -- "Surveyor's symbols"? Seriously? -- why did Palin's team wait to come up with this alternative interpretation until yesterday?

Seriously? Why didn't the Palin camp tell us they were "surveyor's marks" before now? Why not tell us when the controversy first flared up months ago? For that matter, why did Palin Because they weren't surveyor's marks then, and they aren't now. It doesn't pass the laugh test, and nobody except true believers on the right buys it.

I'll give the Palin camp credit for quick thinking. But Steve Benen poses the ultimate question.

And the third question is, I wonder just how difficult it would be for Palin to simply acknowledge, "In retrospect, those crosshairs were inappropriate. I regret it."

Why, indeed, for someone who lies as easily and lies as often as Palin does?

On the eve of Palin's latest version of reality, the Dish offers a recap of all the demonstrable lies she has told in the public record. We reprint the list as a public service and invite readers to run the new "book" through exactly the same empirical wringer, so we can compile an up-to-date and comprehensive list of the fantasies, delusions, lies and non-facts that Palin is so pathologically and unalterably attached to. Remember: we are not including contested stories that we cannot prove definitively one way or another or the usual spin that politicians use, or even hypocrisy or shading of facts. We are merely including things she has said or written that can be definitively proven as untrue, by incontestable evidence in the public record.

After you have read these, ask yourself: what wouldn't Sarah Palin lie about if she felt she had to?

Why not just say that she regrets it? Because at her core she probably doesn't regret it. Then why not lie and just say that she regrets it? Because ... well maybe because there is at least one thing Sarah Palin can't lie about, even if she feels she has to. Perhaps Ms. "Don't Retreat, Just Reload" would lose some of her most rabid supporters if she "retreated."

She can't come right out and say she doesn't regret it. But she can't say she does. The best alternative is to lie about what she did and try to cover her tracks.


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


I'll just vocalise the (apparently) unmentionable.

Gun control is desperately needed in the US. It may help resolve the murder epidemic in this country.

Rick Sutton | January 11, 2011 5:25 PM

This is a cross-hair. No doubt about it. Surveyor's symbol? For what purpose would they use a surveyor's symbol? To detect direction, to discern true north?

Isn't it odd, that of all the things the unGov has said, this is the one thing that my cause her the most damage?

It's the "Capone Effect." Karma sometimes hits where we least expect it, but Lady Karma usually wins.

Actually, between the graphics and retoric used if it would have been ANYONE who is non-white, non-conservative, non-chrsitian, non-beauty queen doing what Palin did that person would be in Gitmo breathing water thru a burlap bag over their head while being held with no charges!

YOU know it, I know it, WE all know that its true.

Palin, Beck, O'Reiley and Limbaugh should all be brought in to a civil court at least and be held financially accountable for their words, deeds and the sad results of those actions.

At least two dead?

It's been beyond widely reported that there are six dead, so I don't understand why you would use the low ball description of "at least two dead". The only reasons I can think of aren't very positive about the writer, and don't make sense to me.

Terrance wrote the post before the official count was released but it was held in queue for publishing. The Ed Team should have updated that section. I apologize.

Thanks for the clarification, Bil. Articles are held for three days?

The only real solution to our nation's Palin problem? Arm the polar bears, wolves and moose of Alaska... arm them to the teeth!!!

No, we should just put her out on the pack ice, and let nature take it's course with her.

"No, we should just put her out on the pack ice, and let nature take it's course with her."

While I'm as terrified by the prospect of Palin gaining any further power as the next person, can no-one see the irony of this comment in light of a post on Palin's own violent rhetoric?

If the aspiration is to be better than she is, more effort is needed.

I am surveyor & there is no such "surveyors symbol"