Don Davis

Social Security: Where's Our Tahrir Square?

Filed By Don Davis | February 03, 2011 6:30 PM | comments

Filed in: Politics
Tags: Barack Obama, Congress, Democrats, march, politics, Progressive, Republican, Social Security

We have seen some amazing days in Egypt, and it has provided a better lesson than anyone could have expected for how taking action, against long odds, can really get something done.

egyptprotestchicago.jpgA secret police mechanism has been pushed aside, an Army has chosen not to attack The People, and a President who was backed by the "full faith and credit" of the US Government on Friday was being told by that same government on Tuesday that it's time to go.

The People, in fact, spoke so loudly that Mr. Mubarak has informed Egyptians that he's going to "pursue corruption," which if taken literally, could eventually look like a puppy chasing its own tail.

The People, however, are unhappy with his answer, and they're speaking even louder - willing to take beatings, gunfire, and, believe it or not camel charges to make their voices heard.

It all got me to thinking about Social Security.

We are facing the potential for a great big Social Security fight for pretty much the entire term of the 112th Congress - and it seems to me that a series of great big "Cairo-style" marches might be the way to make our voices heard so that this Congress understands that great big benefit cuts are something that we will not tolerate.

Oh, Vanity of vanities!
How wayward the decrees of Fate are;
How very weak the very wise,
How very small the very great are!


- William Makepeace Thackeray, from the "Vanitas Vanitatum"

It is a simple point I make today: we want a Social Security program that's in fiscal balance, and raising the income tax cap can do that without changing the retirement age or means testing, or anything else Let's just do it already!

Raising the tax cap? If you make over $107,000 a year, that income is tax-exempt when it comes to Social Security. Taxing that income would fix the entire financing problem, with money left over, which means you could actually cut payroll tax rates for all workers at the same time.

On the other side are those who seek to cut benefits for future recipients, and there is no logical reason why, when we have a simple fix in hand. There is still a community of folks that have considerable influence in all the right places.

But as we have learned this week, even when the other side has considerable influence in the wrong places, people can beat the odds and change the political dynamic, and they can do it in a way that can't be turned back, even if the other side is willing to kill you where you stand.

If pro-democracy demonstrators in Liberation Square can do it, why can't we? Who wants to make Social Security work for everyone?

Now I'm not suggesting that we gather up our camels and bottles and gasoline and head for the barricades, but I am suggesting that if we do not make the same kind of assertive showing the "Tea Party" folks did during the runup to the health care debate, then we are missing a huge opportunity. If we fail we'll have to wonder if not acting on this kind of strategy will cost us support we badly need.

We can even do it in an alternative way: let's schedule friendly Town Hall meetings with members of Congress who would like to help, and let's hear from constituents, of all persuasions, about how they would absolutely not like to see their Social Security cut.

Who would show up to demand they get their benefits cut?

My guess, it'll be just the opposite. I would expect to see lots of folks, of all ages, who are tired of getting screwed, and who don't want to get screwed again. I would bet they will be nice and enthusiastic about expressing that point of view?

Get it on the TV, build a bit of momentum, and by summer you could be scheduling a nice "Social Security Flat Tax Now!" march on the National Mall, kinda like what Stewart and Colbert did last year.

Once you do that, as we learned during the health care debate, Democrats and Republicans alike can be "managed" more effectively. Those "paid for by Pete Peterson" deficit commission staff members will end up being a less profitable investment than a credit default swap denominated in Icelandic krona and executed with the Central Bank of Greece as a counterparty and a consortium of the Central Banks of Portugal and Iceland as guarantors.

It may be snowing today, but the blossoms will be on the cherry trees in just a few weeks, and if we're going to get this together, we better get started right away.

So...my Social Security friends and allies...anyone know some cooperative Members of Congress?

Author's Note: We spent some time in December working to help Betsie Gallardo, who was trying to have her Florida prison sentence commuted so that she could end her life at home with a bit of dignity.

That effort was successful, and we now know that she did pass away January 31st, surrounded by friends and family, and we wish her adoptive mother, Jessica Bussert, and all those friends and family all our warmest thoughts.

It will soon be spring, and the flowers will again bloom, and when they do perhaps we'll see in them, as we did with Betsie, a reminder of the beauty that life can bring--and just how fragile that beauty can be.


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


beachcomberT | February 3, 2011 9:02 PM

And for starters let's take a look at the convoluted formula that decreed that SS recipients did not experience any inflation in 2009 and 2010.

Bill Perdue Bill Perdue | February 4, 2011 6:28 AM

Walk (march) Like An Egyptian

It's a nice dream, but there are reasons those folks showed up to protest against health care reform and people won't show up to lift the SS cap.

First, it'll be hard to get the rich to bankroll the latter, while they were more than willing to fund the former.

Second, the former had decades of false narratives behind it (waiting lines will keep you from your doctor! socialized medicine has failed everywhere it's been tried! We just can't afford it now!). The latter has also had plenty of false narratives, but in the other direction (social security is going to collapse! The only way to save it is to privatize it! social security won't be around when you get old, so we have to eliminate it!).

Third, most people aren't thinking about their retirement as much as they think about their health care.

We should be thinking about educating people about social security - most people don't even know how it works. It'll take more than a few months, but it'd be worth it.

On February 3rd the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force launched a campaign to stop congress from cutting social security benefits. 2500 LGBT activists in Minneapolis signed postcards declaring "Hands off Social Security" which we will deliver to senate offices on Capitol Hill. The same night lgbt activists around the country signed a petition telling congress not to cut benefits. It is important to know that as we age LGBT people are more reliant on guaranteed social security benefits as past the age of 65 we have less resources. It's not too late! We will continue to collect signatures. Follow this link: http://www.kintera.org/c.5oJFLRPvFiJWG/b.6538501/k.5C54/Hands_Off_Social_Security/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?auid=7697400 to sign on. Join us now in protecting Social Security.