On Wednesday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, one of the most important legal bodies concerned with human rights in the Americas, heard the case of Karen Atala, a lesbian mother from Chile who lost the custody of her three children in 2003. The Chilean Supreme Court ruled in 2003 that Atala was unfit to maintain any custody of her children because of her sexual orientation. The fact that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights heard Atala's case this week is significant because it is the first time the court has ever heard a case dealing specifically with sexual orientation.
In 2001, Atala, a criminal court judge, separated from her husband and soon after, moved in with a woman, Emma de Ramón. Atala's former husband sued for full custody of their three daughters, saying that Atala's lesbian relationship would damage the girls.
Although Atala won the case in some of the lower courts, in 2003 the Supreme Court of Chile overruled those decisions, asserting that the lesbian relationship put the daughters in a "position of risk."







Leave a comment
We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.
The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.
This is particularly surprising, since the Inter-American Court has traditionally done very little of practical significance in the way of human rights.
More importantly, WHO will enforce the decisions they come down with?