Terrance Heath

Pat Robertson: The GOP's New Voice of Reason

Filed By Terrance Heath | October 27, 2011 6:30 PM | comments

Filed in: Fundie Watch, Politics
Tags: David Brooks, GOP presidential candidates, Pat Robertson, Peggy Noonan, Republican base, Republican primary voter

It was noteworthy when Peggy Noonan -- Our Lady of the Dolphins -- stepped into the role of the GOP’s voice of reason, following the rise of Sarah Palin as its vice presidential nominee in 2008. Step 12: shake Pat Robertson's handIt was a real eyebrow-raiser when David Brooks took on the task of talking sense to Republicans during the debt deal debacle, before returning to his “sinners in the hands of an angry market” theme.

This summer, in the middle of the debt ceiling debate, I tried to sum up the significance of those two moments.

You can take your pick for the moment the GOP noticably went off the rails. I have two favorites: when it fell to Peggy Noonan to be the Republicans’ voice of reason following Sarah Palin’s VP nomination, and when David Brooks warned the GOP that it “may no longer be a normal party”. Together, they’re the political equivalent of Courtney Love showing up at your intervention and Charlie Sheen offering you a ride to rehab. But this Republican party isn’t likely to heed such sane voices as Noonan and Brooks, and would just as soon throw them overboard.

At the time, I thought it couldn’t get much worse. But now, it’s fallen to Pat Robertson -- yes that Pat Robertson -- serve as the GOP’s latest voice of reason.

What does it mean when a political party has become too extreme for Pat Robertson?

On his show “The 700 Club,” televangelist Pat Robertson commented on the views of the GOP, calling them a bit too extreme.

Robertson quoted Lyndon Johnson: “Don’t these people realize that if they push me over to an extreme position, I’ll lose the election?”

The notoriously controversial Christian figure mentioned that if candidates venture into heavily radical territory, it could cost Republicans the general election.

“Those people in the Republican primary have got to lay off of this stuff,” he exclaimed. “If they want to lose, this is the game for losers.”

I thought it would be helpful to put this statement in the context of some of Robertson’s previous statements. So, here’s video compilation. It’s a long one, but that’s because there was so much content to include.

Keep in mind that this is the same Pat Robertson who:

The Republican part has become too extreme for Pat Robertson’s liking? That’s more than a little disturbing.

If having Peggy Noonan as the voice of reason is like having Courtney Love show up at your intervention, and having David Brooks as the voice of sanity is like having Charlie Sheen offer to drive you to rehab, then having Pat Robertson attempt to talk you down from the ledge may be a bit like having Keith Richards as your rehab counselor.

(img src)


Recent Entries Filed under Fundie Watch:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


Aubrey Haltom | October 28, 2011 7:42 AM

It's already been noted re: Robertson's statement that he's talking strategically, not ideologically.

He's essentially admitting that the radical positions held by the fundamentalist/tea party crowd won't play (as is) with a large number of Americans.

His 'tone it down' advise is meant to win the election, not to change their beliefs.

And I'll note - we're also being given the 'wink wink' by Democrats as well. e.g., Obama can't win if he supports marriage equality, real financial regulation, environmental concerns, etc...

So unfortunately we've got both political parties saying they have to lie to win. That their bases are too out of touch with mainstream.

It makes you wonder what these campaign advisors think of the American voters.

Or maybe what the American voter actually thinks.