Bil Browning

Indy Passes Domestic Partner Benefits with Bipartisan Support

Filed By Bil Browning | August 14, 2012 11:00 AM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics
Tags: Angela Mansfield, domestic partner benefits, Greg Ballard, Indiana Family Institute, Indianapolis City-County Council, Michael McQuillen

The Indianapolis City-County Council passed a proposal to offer domestic partner benefits to employees who aren't married. The measure passed 20-8 with overwhelming bipartisan support.

I reported last week that Tea Party mayor Greg Ballard has indicated that he's waffling over whether or not to support the measure. bigstock--d-House-metaphore-and-insuran-13801277.jpgBallard is known for bucking the Republican Party's anti-gay stance - even going so far as to testify against a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage and civil unions in Indiana.

Instead of your usual anti-gay stance, Ballard is using the measure as a tool to win concessions from Democrats over taxes. His cover story is that he's afraid it will encourage straight couples to shack up and skip getting married altogether. "In my mind, those who get in trouble with the law usually come from families that are not together," he told the Indy Star. "That's just the thing with me."

Ballard, who met Monday with organizations opposed to the ordinance, said he has been wavering on whether he would veto the measure. He said he isn't concerned about moral implications of offering benefits to gay city employees. He would prefer that Indianapolis offer benefits only to same-sex domestic partners because he sees offering them to opposite-sex partners as a "disincentive to marry."

While the council's 20 votes in support would be enough to override a mayoral veto, Minority Leader Michael McQuillen said it's doubtful Republicans who supported the ordinance would do so. He thinks the measure's bipartisan support, though, makes the odds of a veto less than 50 percent.

The Indiana Family Institute has jumped into the fray e-mailing some real whoppers to their sheeple. Their last missive made me giggle like mad. In one paragraph they claim the benefits won't cost $200k/year like the city claims; instead the measure will cost "as much as $1 million per year or more annually." In the next paragraph they insist that it will only benefit "a handful of homosexual City of Indianapolis employees."

Unsurprisingly, the group doesn't worry about straight couples like the Mayor claims he does. They focus all of their vitriol for gays and lesbian couples.

(Domestic partner benefits graphic via Bigstock)


Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.