Don Sherfick

Musings in the new year

Filed By Don Sherfick | January 04, 2007 7:29 AM | comments

Filed in: Entertainment, Living, Marriage Equality, Politics
Tags: Brian Bosma, George W. Bush, Indiana, Resolutions

Well, the tree is down, the ornaments and lights packed away (never, ever again even remotely fitting back into the tight little boxes they occupied on the retailer's shelves), and the noisemakers swept from Times Square for another year. May it all have been peaceful and memorable for you and yours, or at minimum, something that didn't take you too far over your credit card limit.

As to New Year's expectations, I'm mildly disappointed that God didn't give Pat Robertson any clue as to whether or not I will win Powerball in 2007, or if She did, that Pat simply isn't sharing right now. And I'm not holding my breath when I read that 38th Street is really finished and open until the Rapture, or until the Colts have a Superbowl-worthy defense, whichever comes first (or is it last?).

But I'm optimistic on a number of other fronts. Bush 43 faces both a Democrat-controlled House and Senate, Rummy is gone (although I thought his eulogy of Gerald Ford yesterday was infinitely better than his post-Iraq-invasion plans), and Brian Bosma will be wielding neither the gavel nor the prayerbook in the 2007-08 Indiana House. And I still hold out hope that the next time God speaks to Brian and his disciples about what the second paragraph of the so-called "Indiana Marriage Amendment" means, it will confirm what all the Saints, Angels, and Archangels concluded some time ago: They haven't a clue. And neither do I.

Happy New Year!

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

I have my own list of questions for Pat Robertson. He needs to nail down a few facts when he talks to God.

Marla R. Stevens | January 6, 2007 5:19 PM

From what I've been reading, nobody really knows anywhere else similar language has been enacted, either. I think that pretty much defines one thing -- that it's unconstitutionally vague. Talk about an invitation to judicial activism!