Marti Abernathey

Bush Doesn't Care About America

Filed By Marti Abernathey | August 08, 2007 8:19 PM | comments

Filed in: Politics
Tags: George W. Bush, hate crimes against LGBT people, Republicans

When Kayne West said "George Bush doesn't care about black people!" , he was partly right. George Bush doesn't care about the majority of Americans or what they care about. From HRC's "Back Story" blog:

It's really sad, but apparently Bush never tires of catering to his base, despite the undeniable (and well publicized) loss of confidence in his judgment and leadership by the majority of Americans. It’s not that complicated. In May, Gallup released a poll that showed overwhelming support for adding sexual orientation and gender identity to the new hate crimes law. There was strong support across demographic lines. There were just 26% of Americans against the new law.

Apparently he doesn't even care about his own party. With his poll numbers in the tank at 29%, he continues the war in Iraq against what the American people have repeatedly stated they want. If there is no change in his position by November 2008, Republicans will lose seats in both houses by a historic margin.

And why would he go against the majority of Americans that support hate crimes legislation? According to a statement in the Washington Times, the White House will veto the legislation because:

"The qualifications [in the bill] are so broad that virtually any crime involving a homosexual individual has potential to have hate crimes elements," - White House spokesman Tony Fratto

This is the same type of false rhetoric that the religious right is throwing around. From the legislation, a hate crime is committed when one:

"willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability of any person"

George Bush (and Republicans in general) haven't worked to invalidate 18 U.S.C. § 245 (b)(2), the hate crimes law that was passed in 1969, so I'm not sure why he'd veto this one.

I honestly can't figure out why he's doing this. The Republican Party has been on an upswing since 1994. Yet he seems to be oblivious to polling, to the what the American people want, or much of anything else that will keep his party from being destroyed in 2008.

And the thing that is most befuddling is that this legislation will pass. It's simply a matter of when, not if. By putting up this roadblock he's turning more voters against the Republican Party. In the end, he's harming his own party and the American people.

I still ask myself, for what reason?

cross posted from

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.


There are times when we should not question good fortune and just go with it. President Bush is doing harm to the Republican Party which has done so much harm to people of all stripes. In his arrogance and foolishness he has set in motion a reversal of what seemed like a strong GOP governing majority. We are not out of the woods yet and we will need the Democrats not only to win back the White House, but also increase their current majorities in Congress. Then, of course, we will need them to have the courage to act.

"There are times when we should not question good fortune and just go with it."

Good fortune unless you're the victim of a hate crime between now and passage. Or if you're a soldier in Iraq, or citizen of Iraq... then there's nothing good about it.

I do understand what you are ssying, but I really wonder what is going on in their minds to do something so stupid. They're imploding their party from the inside.

Also, Democrats are not always our friends. Here in Indiana, when we had the vote on SJR7 the first time, there were only 7 state senators that voted against the amendment.

Bill Clinton harmed the chances for marriage equality more than any other elected offical to date. He is the one who signed into law DOMA (not to mention DADT).

I'm glad to see that the Democrats are pandering for our money. But I've been around long enough to see both sides play the gay card against each other. Again from Indiana, the Indiana Democratic Party wasn't beyond smearing Mitch Daniels when he met with leaders in the GLBT community. But it's just not here locally.

Remember in 2006 when Jeff Soref resigned as the Chair of the gay caucus because Howard Dean eliminated the gay outreach desk?

Most Republican's are our enemy, no doubt. But we need to keep in mind that Democrats have hurt us more legislatively in the big picture. Until they come on board with full marriage equality, and full support of ENDA, and the hate crimes bill, they aren't our friends either.