Michael Crawford

Fred Thompson Backtracking on Gay Marriage?

Filed By Michael Crawford | August 20, 2007 10:00 AM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics
Tags: Fred Thompson, gay rights, LGBT, marriage, politics

I wrote a couple of days ago about the CNN interview with possible Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson in which he expressed support for amendments to the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage and abortion rights, which you can read here. Now Fred's non-campaign has issued a "clarification."

In an interview with CNN today, former Senator Fred Thompson’s position on constitutional amendments concerning gay marriage was unclear.

Thompson believes that states should be able to adopt their own laws on marriage consistent with the views of their citizens.

He does not believe that one state should be able to impose its marriage laws on other states, or that activist judges should construe the Constitution to require that.

If necessary, he would support a constitutional amendment prohibiting states from imposing their laws on marriage on other states.

Fred Thompson does not support a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.

In other words, Fred is backtracking so that he does not appear as really, really anti-gay, just as a supporter of states' rights. I wonder if Fred would have also used the states' rights argument during the Black civil rights movement as justification for supporting separate schools for Black and white students. As it is now, he is advocating that same-sex and opposite-sex couples be treated differently under the law.

He does hold out the possibility of of supporting a federal constitutional amendment if the U.S. Supreme Court were to overturn what many consider to be the unconstitutional Defense of Marriage Act although Fred spins it as supporting an amendment "prohibiting states from imposing their laws on marriage on other states." In any event, it boils down to Fred wanting to protect the special right to marriage that opposite-sex couples have in 49 states including the multiple marriages that he, Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Newt Gingrich have all had.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Anyone who doubts that FT unequivocally said he supports a full FMA should simply watch the unedited interview video.

Try research instead of lipsearch Mike.

Look up federalism just to see if you can teach an old dog new tricks instead of running your mouth about "backtracking" or "spin".

Fred did not backtrack at all. The original report improperly characterized what Fred said. If you had bothered to actually read Fred's own words, you would understand that the "clarification" was about CNN's sloppy wording, not about Fred's position.

Thompson did indeed backtrack. If you watch the interview, he SPECIFICALLY states support for a constitutional amendment. The only sloppy wording here is Fred's own.