Alex Blaze

Sarah Palin: John McCain will push for FMA

Filed By Alex Blaze | October 23, 2008 8:30 PM | comments

Filed in: Fundie Watch, Marriage Equality, Politics
Tags: federal marriage amendment, FMA, gay marriage, gay Republicans, homophobic behavior, John McCain, lcr, log cabin republicans, marriage, marriage equality, palin, same-sex marriage, Sarah Palin, Washington Blade

Is she off-message or does she know something we don't know?

Palin told Dr. James Dobson in a radio interview, which aired today, that she believes McCain -- if elected -- will implement the Republican Party platform, which includes positions stem cells, abortion and gay marriage that are more conservative than previous positions McCain has taken.

"I do, from the bottom of my heart," she told Dobson. "I am such a strong believer that McCain believes in those strong planks and we do have good conversations about some of the details too, about the different planks and what they represent."

Dobson began the conversation by calling the platform the "strongest pro-life, pro-family document to come out of a political party." More conservative than in previous elections, the Republican platform this year advocates for a constitutional amendments to ban abortion and define marriage as between a man and a woman, as well as ban on embryonic stem cell research.

LCR's been touting this interview McCain did with the Washington Blade. I don't really know why, since it isn't all that good. It's the normal "I like gay people, but I'm opposed to everything that would make their lives easier" banter we've been getting from his campaign. He has gay friends, y'know.

Here he is on DADT:

I promise to give full consideration to any legislation that reaches my desk. On "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," I'm going to defer to our military commanders. So far they have told me it's working. I'm willing to have the policy reviewed to make sure that's the case, but at the end of the day, I'm going to rely on the commanders who will be impacted by a change in the law.


However, at the same time, my own view is that marriage should be reserved for a man and a woman. That's what I supported in Arizona. I realize this is a controversial issue and we must conduct this debate in a way that respects the dignity of every person.

And adoption:

As someone who adopted a child, Cindy and I know better than most couples the amazing satisfaction that comes from providing love to an unwanted child. I believe a child is best raised by a mother and father because of the unique contributions that they make together to the development of a child.

Everything else was fluff or dodging the question, and this bit on FMA:

I voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment in 2004 and 2006. I continue to oppose such an amendment today, because as I've explained this should be a state matter, and not one for the federal government -- as long as no state is forced to adopt some other state's standard.

Well, that's the opposite of what Sarah Palin said. This means that either:

  1. the campaign is trying to play to both sides of the fence here but really doesn't care,
  2. Sarah Palin doesn't know what she's talking about, or
  3. John McCain pretends that he likes gays to seem like a maverick, but FMA's on the table if he wins.

The campaign responded to this discrepancy:

Asked whether Palin misspoke or whether McCain was changing his position on these social issues, Palin spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt replied, "John McCain and Gov. Palin both strongly support the fundamental principles of the GOP platform."

In other words, they know, but they're sure as hell not going to tell us.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

The only reason she qualifies as a "maverick" is because she just says whatever she wants. Whether it makes sense or not.

Should I act surprised at this?

OMG How could they! I mean I thought they actually liked gay people, I mean what with all the gay friends they say they have.

There, is that better.

Palin is way beyond being a loose cannon, she is the entire powder magazine going postal. She has gotten so full of herself and her percieved power of the bully pulpit, that she is pulling out the stops and going full steam ahead with her theocratic agenda. I mean all those "good" americans at her rallies seem to love it when she pours on the hate and bigotry message, calling Obama a 'terrorist' and socialist, and hearing them scream back their chants of "kill him" and other invective.

At least McCain has the decency to look a little embarrassed when that happens, she just stands up there smirking. I half expect her to give a 'seig heil' salute while stormtroopers start waving swastika flags overhead.
Yeah, she has the hate and fearmongering down pat, now all she needs is that funny little mustache.

I'm convinced that Palin knows McCain's going down to defeat, and is positioning herself to be the nominee in 2012/2016. She has contradicted McCain platform positions in the past couple of weeks, as if to distance herself from him. The GOP needed a star, and she and Dobson and his friends think she is it.

The new maverick is bucking the old maverick. Of course, the fact that their policies make them both rusty old Mavericks with bad rings, means that I don't care whether it's a 1970 or 1977 model Maverick. They both need to be junked.

Yes, junk the Mavericks!

So, basically, no honor among thieves...