Nancy Polikoff

New York Times Comes Through Again...Who's Listening?

Filed By Nancy Polikoff | January 06, 2009 6:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, The Movement
Tags: Arkansas adoption ban, LGBT parents, Sharon Bottoms

This morning's New York Times editorial condemning Arkansas's ban on adoption and foster parenting by anyone living with a same-sex partner or unmarried different-sex partner is a welcome piece of advocacy. NYT calls the law "offensive" and urges the court to strike it down.

More than 15 years ago, I received a call from a member of the NYT editorial board. The board had decided to editorialize after a Virginia judge removed a child from the custody of his mother, Sharon Bottoms, and placed him with Sharon's mother. The Bottoms case received unprecedented press coverage. And so the New York Times published its first editorial expressing unequivocal support of lesbian and gay parents. "In deciding what's best for a child," NYT wrote, "it's fair to look at a large range of issues. But the sexual orientation of parents is not one of them. Gay parents should not have to live in fear of losing their children simply because of who they are."

In some states, LGBT parents still risk losing custody of their children to a heterosexual parent after a divorce. And gay rights advocates expect efforts to reproduce the Arkansas initiative in other states.

I was ecstatic with the 1993 NYT editorial. When the Virginia Court of Appeals reversed the trial judge in Bottoms, citing the research demonstrating no harm to children raised by lesbian mothers, I thought it was the beginning of the end of discrimination against lesbian and gay parents. But the Virginia Supreme Court overturned that Court of Appeals decision, and young Tyler never did go back to his mother.

And as for recognition of the research on the well-being of children with lesbian and gay parents, well it certainly has not received universal acceptance. Neither has the position of the New York Times. Still, today's editorial is a good read.

Crossposted from Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Nice to see them doing something positive. I have been pretty much a big detractor of them since they attacked bisexuals through a story based on that psuedo-scientific study that claimed that there is no such thing as male bisexuals. Maybe I will eventually change my mind about them.

I am a big fan of the New York Times. Unfortunately, it isn't very well read in Arkansas (or Indiana either).