Alex Blaze

The Bush Legacy

Filed By Alex Blaze | January 19, 2009 5:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Politics
Tags: Al Gore, America, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Hurricane Katrina, new orleans, politicization of the justice department, randian economics, stock market crash, us, Wall Street

The first election I remember paying attention to with any detail was the 2000 presidential elections. I didn't really get a lot of the very serious inner workings of the campaigns - why wanting to have a beer with someone made them a capable leader, why intelligence was a non-factor, or, later, why people didn't want to count every vote in Florida - but my introduction to politics was with George W. Bush, and, up to this day my perspective of American politics has been dominated by that one man.

I'm sure that there are millions of people slightly older and younger than I am with the same perspective - Bush is all we've really known. It's a sad thing, really, since he's normalized things that, before him, were considered unspeakable, like torture. It's a strange way to look at this country, that it considers someone like Bush to be its best leader. It can make someone a little cynical.

Now, just this past week, I was talking about politics with someone who has never really paid attention to the subject. She said that Obama won't change much, no president ever changes much, and that everyday life isn't really affected by whoever is in that office. That kind of attitude, which I remember in abundance in 2000, seems completely ignorant right now.

No single president changes much? Just ask people in Iraq, Afghanistan, New Orleans, Detroit, Wall Street, Guantanamo Bay, or the military - their lives have been dramatically changed because of the 2000 election/Supreme Court decision results.

I think, for an understanding of American culture, it's important to remember that Bush didn't win the 2000 election, but was instead appointed by the Supreme Court which overran the will of the people in Bush v. Gore. While the right likes to bandy about words like "judicial activism," never in recent history has there been such a disregard for the law in favor of raw politics on that court like there was after the Florida fiasco.

While I do remember people in my modest home town/Republican stronghold begging everyone else to just get over it and admit that Bush was president, I don't think that a lot of people really got over it. I remember even a politically aware friend at the time, who was about as far left as they come in Carmel, Indiana, was even asking for Gore to just give up and respectfully concede to Bush. There was an epidemic in the US of nonchalance as the media told us to get over it as, well, we did.

While Bush is saying that only history can judge him, it's pretty clear that his legacy will be dominated by:

  • Crashing the economy with Randian economics

  • Starting a war against a country that posed no threat to the US

  • Legitimizing the idea of a preemptive war

  • Making torture seem like a necessary, mature response to any threat against the US

  • Expanding the powers of the executive to completely ignore the rule of law

  • Strengthening the idea that powerful people are simply better than everyone else, so they can do what they want

  • Making protest and democracy moot

  • Politicizing any part of the government he could get his hands on to the point where much of it was dysfunctional

  • Allowing the biggest foreign attack against American civilians to happen

  • Furthering the conservative backlash against respect for other cultures and peoples

Now there's a large segment of American politics who thinks that this is exactly how things are supposed to work. There's another large segment who'll be calling Barack Obama out for participating in any of these actions, after letting Bush get away with them, even encouraging him, for eight long years.

Obama has delivered a few mixed, and often weak, messages about turning some of these around. While he's made it clear that he won't continue torture, he's not likely to prosecute those who did it. While he said he'd eventually close down Guantanamo Bay, he's looking for a new legal framework for prosecution, which will only delay the termination of that camp, perhaps indefinitely. He wants to pass a large stimulus plan, but a surprisingly large amount of it is devoted to tax cuts.

This isn't to say that Obama is horrible. Far from it. We'll soon find out exactly what he can and will do on each of these issues.

But it does point to the depth of the Bush legacy by showing how, in many ways, Obama isn't starting from the center and moving left, but instead has to pull the political establishment and the country back from the extreme-right. It will hamstring him. Our scholars, pundits, politicians, and compatriots now believe that the most bizarre, idiotic, or immoral acts are normal. As hated as Bush was towards the end of his second term, he was still powerful enough to handicap the left for a good while.

If Obama is concerned with building a lasting American agenda centered around what is good instead of what is right-wing, as he says he is, he's going to have to find a way to overcome these forces, prosecute the prosecutable wrongs of the Bush years, and build a new consensus around what is considered normal, serious, and mature.

Because, if he doesn't, I can easily see a Bush III being elected in eight or twelve years, and we'll be right back to where we are today. If the people don't know why everything messed up over these past 8 years, and if future politicians don't know that punishment will be in the works if they break the law, then Bush's legacy will be more bigger than Obama's.

And that's not the way this is all supposed to work.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

"That which does not kill us, makes us stronger."

"The greatest enemy to truth is not lies, but conviction."

Two of my favorite quotes which are as pertinate today, as they were when Nietzche wrote them back in the late 19th century.
(They are also two of the only quotes that I can ever remember correctly for some reason, strange that, since there are a few from Franklin that I would love to be able to use.)

Personally, I think if Obama repeals the Patriot act, gets us out of Iraq, and overturns the directives that allow rendition and 'extreme' interrogation methods, I will be satisfied for the time being.

All of those things are a mark of shame on the US. That we allowed the government to frighten us enough that we let such things be done in our name, all for the sake of the illusion of security, is a disgrace.

I have been following Presidents since the 1960s, and hold a degree in international relations (polisci), which qualifies me to work in a call center. But I digress.

Never before, in my personal history, have I had the feeling, the fervent desire, to hope for someone to please inflict catastrophic harm, either emotionally or physically, on an outgoing President, as I do for George Walker Bush. That is because never before has a President so disdainful of the will, desires, and best wishes of the people been elected; never before has a man so clearly unstable, emotionally disconnected, and intellectually incompetent been allowed to attempt to serve as President. Yes, I wish ill upon him, although I would never carry it out myself; the karmic wheel will get him, I am certain. However, even more so, I wish horrible, disfiguring illness upon the kingmakers who controlled GW Bush, who convinced this alcoholic neer-do-well that he could govern, that he could be President, despite the fact that he didn't have the brains God gave land-crab.

When the roll call of incompetent Presidents is read by historians, until worse comes along, GW Bush will be at the head of the list, ahead of Warren Harding, Ulysses Grant, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Franklin Pierce, Richard Nixon, John Tyler, Herbert Hoover, Zachary Taylor, Calvin Coolidge, and William Henry Harrison. Yes, I feel strongly Bush was nothing short of the worst President of all time.

On that note, I wish Godspeed to Barack Obama. He has a horribly hard job ahead. As for G.W. Bush, may he return to his Jim Beam and Peruvian marching powder in his McMansion in DFW, and die a drunken death, a President, but still a loser and a lowdown drunk, who governed as a lowdown drunk would govern. There is a spit in hell waiting for him.

Agreed, Alex. The one thing Obama has going for him is that so many people aren't apathetic over his presidency. I just hope the excitement continues but Americans expect instant results or their attention wanders.

I don't think the problem will be expecting instant results. Our expectations for those in power has taken a significant beating since 2000.

I think the real problem will be people forgetting what was so bad about Bush, about what needed to be fixed, should Obama fix the economy. After that issue I don't have much faith in Americans in general.

So has ENDA passed this afternoon?
(miming Bil's "Americans expect instant results")