Rev Irene Monroe

Morehouse's non-tolerance for gays

Filed By Rev Irene Monroe | October 21, 2009 6:30 PM | comments

Filed in: Living
Tags: African-American, black, black men, dress code, education policy, Morehouse College, William Jefferson White

Morehouse College has a problem with its dress-code offenders.

These dress-code offenders wear baggy pants, du-rags, flash their "bling bling" like gold chains, and "decorative orthodontic appliances" like gold teeth, and tattoos, bringing too much of black urban ghetto life to an elite college that fashions itself as the paragon of black manhood.

In Morehouse's effort to "get back to [its] legacy," Dr. William Bynum, vice president of the office of student services discussed with Safe Space, the school's gay, bisexual transgender, and queer (GBTQ) organization, the school's new "Appropriate Attire Policy" banning dress-wearing.

"And if anyone sees this policy as something that is restrictive then maybe Morehouse is not the place for you," Cameron Thomas-Shah, student government co-chief of staff told the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

Since its inception in 1867, Morehouse College is noted as the bastion of black male leadership and masculinity. Embodying W. E.B. Dubois's theory of The Talented Tenth, where "exceptional black men" would be the ones to lead the race, Morehouse College has produced unquestionably a pantheon of noted black men; its most famous alumnus, Martin Luther King, Jr., graduated from Morehouse in 1948

And its alums maintain the "Morehouse mystique" the college is renowned for: "images of strong black men."

However, nowhere in its development of strong black men were GBTQ men included in its elite vision of brotherhood. And now, more than a century later, GBTQ Morehouse men are still struggling to be accepted.

The new dress-code policy is discriminatory because it's aimed at keeping its GBTQ population in the closet.

However, non-tolerance of GBTQ men at Morehouse is not new. It exposes the school's milieu of institutionalized homophobia, ranging from the president's office to the student body.

For example, last month Morehouse fired one of its employees for circulating via the school's work e-mail account her disapproving views of wedding photos of a black gay couple. The employee worked as an administrative assistant in the president's office.

She wrote:

I can't believe this wedding. It's 2 men... Black women can't get a break, either our men want another man, a white woman (or other nationality that's light with straight hair), they are locked up in jail or have a 'use to be' fatal disease. I'm beginning to believe Eve was a black woman and we Black women are paying for all the world's sins through her actions (eating the apple).

Since becoming president in 2007, Robert Franklin has expressed his views on tolerance and discrimination. He said, "As an all-male institution with the explicit mission of educating men with disciplined minds, the great challenge of this moment in history is our diversity of sexual orientation."

And with more and more students arriving on campus openly GBTQ, Morehouse's administration continues to lack the cultural competence and sensitivity to address the issue, fostering students to think there is only one way to be a Morehouse man.

For example, Devrin Lindsay, a junior, stated in the May 2008 Los Angeles Times article "Morehouse College faces its own bias --against gays" that an effeminate man who "swishes down the campus like he's on a runway" damages Morehouse's image for both parents with students looking to attend the college.

But it is Morehouse's highly publicized 2002 gay-bashing incident that has no doubt taught the administration very little.

On November 4, 2002, a Morehouse College student sustained a fractured skull from his classmate, sophomore Aaron Price, not surprisingly, the son of an ultra- conservative minister. Price uncontrollably beat his victim on the head with a baseball bat for allegedly looking at him in the shower.

In the 1980's and 1990's it was more dangerous to be openly GBTQ on Morehouse's campus than it was on the streets in gang-ridden black neighborhoods. And throughout the 1990's Morehouse was listed on the Princeton Review's top 20 homophobic campuses.

But these homophobic incidents at Morehouse speak to a larger issue plaguing men of African descent not only at black colleges but also in their communities -- safely acknowledging their sexuality.

With homophobia running as rampant in historically black colleges and universities as it is in black churches and communities, there are no safe places for them to openly engage the subject of black GBTQ sexualities. Black GBTQ sexualities within African-American culture are perceived to further threaten not only black male heterosexuality, but also the ontology of blackness itself.

Morehouse is lauded as the jewel of black academia. Founded two years after the end of the Civil War by William Jefferson White in the basement of Springfield Baptist Church in Augusta, GA, Morehouse continues to confer degrees on more men of African descent than any institution of higher education in this country.

However, if Morehouse is to continue to be the jewel of black academia nurturing the talents and gifts of its exceptional black men, then it must ask itself to what degree does its tradition hinders its goal?

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Its so offensive, but it just shows how much work we have to do in our communities. There have GOT to be a number of GBT alums from Morehouse. They have a responsibility to contact the administration and do some education. Alums have SO much sway at an institution. Please, if you're a Morehouse Alum, please CALL THEM!

According to a local news piece I heard, the quote from the college administration was that they were "targeting 5 men who are living the gay lifestyle." The dress code specifically mentions "skirts" as not allowed, which to me targets any transgender students.

BUT, we have to keep in mind that Morehouse is an all male college. The problems they have with gay, bisexual and queer men is something they have to be taken to task with. However, if a student is a male-to-female transsexual, or has a need to transition, then wouldn't it make sense that she shouldn't be attending an all male school? In this case, rather than mandating a dress code that forces these women in the closet, it would make sense that they would assist them in transferring to a co-ed school with any scholarships and credits intact. I have friends here looking into the transgender element of this issue. We'll see what happens.

True, Monica --- but what about a FTM? Would Morehouse accept a physical female in the process of transitioning, even if he dressed in the finest male attire? It sounds not likely.

I'd be interested in hearing your opinion about the ban on "baggy pants, du-rags... "bling bling" like gold chains and "decorative orthodontic appliances" like gold teeth, and tattoos." Are you okay with that part of the dress code?

I think those rules are definitely detrimentally cutting down on self-expression and free speech, and they piss me off too. As a teacher, however, I did my share of strict enforcement of dress codes (especially when kids showed up with nasty language or naked girl silhouettes on their shirts) so perhaps I'm a hypocrite!