Phil Reese

Husband of openly gay Illinois Senate candidate's rival makes a scene at Jim Madigan fundraiser.

Filed By Phil Reese | December 13, 2009 1:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics
Tags: Heather Steans, Illinois, Jim Madigan, Senate

What philpic.jpgon earth was Heather Steans' husband Leo Smith doing at the Jim Madigan community fundraiser Thursday night (even though he didn't pay to get in)? It certainly wasn't a diplomatic outreach mission. The prominent donor to shamed former Governor Rod Blagojevich approached Madigan at his event at The Call last night in Andersonville Chicago while Madigan was in the midst of a slightly friendlier conversation with Jacob Meister, the openly gay candidate seeking Barack Obama's former United States Senate seat.

"I'm not here for your event! I know you think you're gonna get famous with all your BULLSHIT! But those things are about me!"

The photos speaks for itself, Smith is obviously disheveled and angry. Onlookers have noted that Smith was belligerent and out-of-sorts. He'd been drinking in a corner of the bar for an hour before he stormed up to Meister and Madigan. He had refused to pay at the door, as the rest of the attendees had done, but was allowed to stay inside of the event, despite his refusal to be respectful. Madigan and Smith's wife, incumbent Senator Heather Steans, are both competing over her Illinois 7th District Senate seat.

After an hour of stewing in a corner of the bar, he went to the bathroom and emerged ready for confrontation, while a surprised Jacob Meister looked on.

"I was in Iowa for two weeks!" He continued to confused looks, "I was in Iowa for Barack Obama! I've helped kids. I'm a progressive, and I've believed in those things. And you're attacking my wife!" reported someone from the event who described Smith as "swearing and speaking in non sequiturs," and that Smith "sat at the bar for an hour drinking and appeared disheveled."

Madigan's response to Smith's ranting was as diplomatic as possible. "If you'd ever heard me speak, you'd know I always say: Heather is a fine person and as a Democrat we share a lot of views in common. But I fundamentally disagree with her on some policy issues, and I think it's wrong how she came into office."

According to attendees, the last sentence in that statement in particular infuriated Smith. According to the witness, "Smith launched into a tirade that Madigan told people that Steans made her decision on recalling Blagojevich because of contributions. 'Those were mine and you think you're gonna besmirch us!'"4 small.jpg

He patronizingly went on, "You've done so much for gay rights. You need to spend a little more time working. You can't even get the endorsement of the ones you worked for!" Referring to the Victory Fund-endorsed candidate's work with Lambda Legal and Equality Illinois, who have yet to endorse any candidate in the race, and are likely to support whichever candidate emerges from the Democratic primary. Lambda Legal doesn't make political endorsements.

One of Madigan's staffers, in trying to diffuse the situation told Leo, "You know a good place for this conversation? In a public debate. So please let the Senator know we'd love to see her there."

Smith continued to badger Madigan, especially on the issue of Steans' Blagojevich ties, and her refusal to support a recall while Blagojevich was still in office, ending with Leo calling Madigan a liar for repeating this fact to the press.

Before Smith stormed out of the bar angrily, Madigan said to him "Look, Suzanne Elder sent Heather and I an invitation to a debate. Why doesn't the Senator come to a debate and tell me what about that isn't true?"

Prominent Democratic fundraiser, Heather Steans--Senator for the Chicago gay-neighborhood, Andersonville, where The Call is located and the fundraiser was being held--was not in attendance at the event where her husband caused the uproar. Nevertheless, his actions will no doubt need to be explained by her campaign, which--up to this point--have not released any comment that could be located through her press website, nor through Google.

The Madigan campaign did release this press statement:

Steans' campaign, and clearly her husband, are so worried about the truth coming out that they will stop at nothing to prevent our campaign from moving forward.

  • Leo and Heather personally donated more than $200,000 to former Blagojevich.
  • Heather's seat was secured for her by the outgoing State Senator Carol Ronen who took a plumb appointment in the Blagojevich administration.
  • Heather voted against recall until after Blagojevich left office, and now supports it.

Clearly, Leo is worried that someone will put all the pieces together.

Madigan continues to put pressure on the well-funded incumbent Senator to debate him on her financial ties to Rod Blagojevich, which she ignored. Certainly, the confrontation with her obviously intoxicated husband won't settle things. However, until Madigan's supporters can make a strong enough statement, its unlikely she will take the risk.

However, gays and lesbians in Illinois--the midwestern state next poised to make marriage equality a reality here in the United States--and even around the nation may also want to have Steans answer their questions. Why did this long time ally of the LGBT community suddenly and without much warning introduce a marriage equality bill this fall only to let it die quietly with no other cosponsors, no movement and no effort to make anything of it whatsoever?

Was the introduction of this marriage bill a sincere move on her part, or strategic campaigning after Jim Madigan announced he was running against her? Either way, the bill's introduction seems not to have helped her out with the LGBT community in Illinois all that much after her failure to promote the bill after its introduction. Meanwhile, Madigan grows in visibility within the Chicago and even national gay community. 1 small.jpg

If Madigan's progressive credentials are strong enough, he will have the opportunity to pose a formidable threat to Steans in this highly progressive portion of the Chicago neighborhoods to the north of Chicago's famous Boystown 'gayborhood.'

What could a Jim Madigan win mean to the marriage equality movement nationally? Well, everything, if all the cards are played right. Having Jim Madigan in the Senate as an openly gay counterpart to the two openly gay assembly-members in the lower house will certainly mean that a relationship recognition bill will finally get pushed. While Greg Harris has done the hard work on his lower-house version of the two relationship recognition bills in the Assembly, the effort has been unmatched in the upper house where no openly gay law makers sit.

A legislative win in Illinois may be far less susceptible to a ballot overturn because of the stricter laws on ballot initiatives in Illinois. There is a much higher number of petition signatories required at over half a million, and the ballot measure must win with over 60% of the vote, rather than 50% as in other states. This means that if Iowa's progressive neighbor Illinois is able to pass civil unions or marriage equality, it is likely to withstand the standard attempt to undermine it.

While Leo Smith's wife Senator Steans has been a fundraising friend to the community's organizations, Madigan's presence in the upper house will surely mean that our nation could gain another marriage equality state soon--right here in the heartland. Perhaps Steans' camp is showing their nervous hand here knowing that once the state and national LGBT organizations figure this out there is only a matter of time before they reconsider who they support if both of the Senate relationship recognition bills continue to sit stalled. As the incumbent in a heavily pro-gay district, this would be bad news for her.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Ahhh..Illinois politics is always entertaining. Just the right touch of the old Capone strong arm techniques and the gentle political subtleties of Dailey the elder about it..

By the way, did anyone notice that Buju Banton is now a guest of the United States Marshals?

Sure did, Maura! I wonder what the GRAMMYs have to say about THAT? What an "honorable" man.

Its probably just his "cultural viewpoint" about our narcotics laws, Phil :)

..or the five kilos he was caught negotiating over.

After this encounter, if I were Jim Madigan, I'd make a special point of alerting security personnel concerning Mr. Smith's attendance at future events.

Smith's behavior is just a little too Dan White-esque for my taste.

I miss Lakeview. :( And the political entertainment that it brings.

There's only reason you show up an opponent's fundraiser-to make a scene.

There is only one reason you allow the husband of your opponent into your fundraiser without paying-you are hoping he makes a scene so you can broadcast it high and low.

Tacky on both sides.

You must not have read too closely, Stean's husband was in the bar for an hour, but not in the Madigan Fundraiser area. The rest of the bar was still open. Stean's husband lurked in the shadows for nearly an hour before anyone even recognized him.

Tacky? Try dense on your part.

Dense? Where was it even said that the rest of the bar was open? Instead the post began with:

"What on earth was Heather Steans' husband Leo Smith doing at the Jim Madigan community fundraiser Thursday night (even though he didn't pay to get in)?"

It continued:

"He'd been drinking in a corner of the bar for an hour before he stormed up to Meister and Madigan. He had refused to pay at the door, as the rest of the attendees had done, but was allowed to stay inside of the event, despite his refusal to be respectful."

If the Madigan campaign didn't rent the whole bar, it certainly seem like they did from the bar. Why else would they be charging at the door (which presumably was for the campaign?).

I guess the better question is why I am arguing with you since you really just want to pick a fight over nonsense.

uh, Lambda Legal is not a political organization -- it's a litigation orgnanization, and a 501c3 not-for-profit. it never, ever endorses political candidates, even when its former employees are running.

so there should be nothing read into its "lack of support" for Madigan.

Hi Phillip-- the bar is in Andersonville, not Lakeview (two very different neighborhoods)

And Phil reese:
you spell the President's name Barack Obama (with a C).

Was the introduction of this marriage bill a sincere move on her part, or strategic campaigning after Jim Madigan announced he was running against her?

I think the answer to that is patently obvious.

Obvious, in that she has been an outspoken supporter of the Civil Unions bill introduced by Greg Harris last year? And an incredibly strong ally of LGBT people in her district?

Obvious: She's an LGBT-positive State Senator, and Madigan is trying to unseat her not for the good of the district but for his own personal gain. I've worked with Madigan and he's a sleaze; Steans gets my vote.


If she was a true lgbt positive state senator, she would've introduced the civil unions bill that has been sitting at the door steps of the state senate for 2 years.

Instead, she does nothing and then gets a gay candidate who actually wrote the bill and decides hey I'll throw all of the hard work away from everyone who worked so hard to get civil unions this far and introduce a gay marriage bill that has no chance of passing and I won't even try to come up with a plan to make it pass.

She has canceled on stonewall and others twice now to sit down to "explain" her plan to pass this marriage bill. She clearly has no idea what she is doing and is only doing it for political points.

I dont' care if you worked for Madigan or not, all I care about in this race is the fact that I was treated like a pawn in her game. If she wants to buy the senate seat, fine. If her husband wants to show up at a bar and yell at a candidate, fine. But don't play with the LGBT community and expect the rest of us to just sit idly by. Enough is enough.