Guest Blogger

A Notre Dame Student Viewpoint: All Eyes on Us

Filed By Guest Blogger | January 21, 2010 6:30 PM | comments

Filed in: Living
Tags: Catholic church, comic books, GSA, Notre Dame, Observer, on-discrimination policy

Editor's Note: Guest Blogger Jason Coleman is a senior accounting major at Notre Dame University. He originally expressed his views on the Observer Comic controversy in a article in the Observer on Jan. 20th.

headshot.jpgLast week, the national LGBT scene was put on notice that Notre Dame was not the most accommodating university for its gay students. As most of the Notre Dame community and readers of this site are aware, an offensive comic ran, went viral, then national, and resulted in a strong backlash against both the comics, the editors of Notre Dame's student run newspaper, the Observer, and the University at large. This is an attempt to move onto the larger issue here, homosexuality at Notre Dame, and some of the issues endemic to this place.

Any conversation on this topic must begin with dorm life. For many students and alum alike, the dorm system is the crown jewel of the Notre Dame experience. The single sex dorms, seemingly bogus to students at other schools, create a sense of fraternity and lasting friendship. However, they are also fetid breeding grounds for rampant homosexual words, phrases, and jokes. I can personally attest to the late night use of the F word thrown in all directions, whether at opposing sports teams, kids down the hall, or even online video game opponents. It is a culture that is accepting for those oblivious to its shortcomings, and, I can only imagine, somewhat terrifying for those whom it targets.

How then, can this issue be fixed?

After all, the dorm system is organic, based on random assortments of students from all over the world. The answer itself lies in this random, diverse group of students thrown together. Because of our university's strides towards diversity, ethnic and socioeconomic groups from everywhere are assigned as roommates, section friends, and dorm members. For this reason, students are much more sensitive to racial issues, and as a result those types of slurs are catapulted across hallways and dorm rooms rarely, and not without consequence.

It appears, then, that the university must become friendlier towards LGBT applicants, and make better efforts to encourage them to apply here so that students do not only experience racial diversity, but diversity across all walks of American life.

To this end, the university not only does not commit itself actively towards finding students from this group, it subversively discourages them from applying in the first place. This comes in two flavors.

The first is the university's annual rejection of any Gay Straight Alliance's application for official recognition. While other clubs on campus, notably the Progressive Student Alliance, work within official status for change, this is not sufficient in demonstrating to prospective students the university's commitment towards LGBT issues. As a prospective student, I remember scanning the list of clubs and picking out which ones sounded fun or relevant to my interests. To imagine that prospective LGBT students are not doing the same thing and feeling discouraged to apply would be lunacy. In a way the Black Student Association or the Asian American association can provide for the needs of its members with official backing, why can a GSA not provide for LGBT students?

The second flavor of discouragement comes from repeated refusals by the administration to amend the non-discrimination policy, which governs both employment and attendance at this school, to include sexual orientation as a protected group. Thirteen years ago, the university prepared the "Spirit of Inclusion", a statement which made special efforts to welcome the gay community to Notre Dame. While this action is certainly appreciated, it lacks any real meat that would hold the university to its actions. The non-discrimination clause would put some conviction behind the words written in the statement.

In its rejection of both a GSA, and an amendment to the non-discrimination policy, the university has cited Church doctrine, teaching, etc. Other critics have also been concerned with legal loopholes that would be opened by amending the non-discrimination policy. I am not a trained theologian by any stretch of the imagination, nor am I a legal scholar (despite taking Business Law). However, I have looked into the policies of a number of other major universities. It turns out that almost every university which I looked into, including most of our football schedule for next year, Georgetown, Loyola, and even small Misericordia University in Dallas, Pennsylvania is on board. This indicates to me that the legal and theological implications of changes at our university have been considered carefully at many other schools, and found to be quite appropriate and worth the price of change. To not make these changes will only cast a serious shadow over our university's attempts to be open and accepting in both word and action.

As this goes to press, a number of petitions are circling to amend the discrimination policy. Last year, they were able to collect signatures of nearly 20% of the students, faculty, and staff and were still denied. It appears this will have to go big if it is going to happen. Second, for any information regarding church teaching and homosexuality, please hop over to the Notre Dame Core Council for Gay and Lesbian students webpage. In my four years, I have never felt an opportunity as strong as the one now to have a true dialogue at Notre Dame, and there is strong reason to believe that all eyes are on us.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Thanks for sharing this, Jason. Let's hope Notre Dame takes the concerns of the students seriously and change the anti-LGBT atmosphere at the school.

Nothing will happen in the near future. Who do you think is behind funding and generous donations to the university?

Which people do you think the university primarily courts as a university of Catholic history?

Sure, they try to string in LGBT students with hollow promises of inclusiveness, but what university doesn't try to broaden their base so they can impose more mortgages that their students will be paying years after graduation?

All universities try to paint themselves as the best thing since sliced bread since this country has a perverse commercial approach to education.

beachcomberT | January 22, 2010 2:47 AM

It would be interesting to hear from GLBT students why they choose to attend Notre Dame if its atmosphere and policies are anti-gay. If church is important to you, I hope you find a gay-affirming church off-campus to liberate you from the poisonous doctrine you are being fed by the administration.

Jason, thanks for your insider view on this well-written piece. Hope your points don't go unheard by Notre Dame administration.

Bruce in Missouri | January 22, 2010 2:51 PM

I doubt you will get the attention of the administration until you make it an accreditation issue. Notre Dame is accredited by the North Central Higher Learning Commission. The Commission itself has a nondiscrimination policy that specifically includes sexual orientation. I recommend you begin documenting specific instances where students, faculty, and staff were discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation, and file a complaint with the commission on the basis that Notre Dame has an inadequate grievance procedure. When the on-site accreditation team shows up on campus for Notre Dame's next scheduled review, make sure the team sees a picket line of students with signs complaining about Notre Dame's inadequate grievance policies. Notre Dame must submit a "campus climate" report as part of their accreditation review--pay close attention to that report. Notre Dame's accreditation is too valuable to the administration for them to risk a black mark from the commission. Get a team of progressive people together to start working on this. Good luck!