Alex Blaze

It's not the hypocrisy, it's the ubiquity: Iris Robinson and Scott Brown's straight moral sex lives

Filed By Alex Blaze | January 11, 2010 7:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Media, Politics
Tags: Cosmopolitan magazine, homophobic behavior, ireland, iris robinson, Massachusetts, parliament, scott brown, uk

I don't care much at all about who or what people want to do in their private lives, but sometimes it becomes apparent that certain public figures' private affairs are affecting their public views and actions that it makes you stop and wonder how many other people, who seem almost sick but you can't quite put your finger on it, actually have stuff like this going on in their backgrounds.

The iris-robinson.jpglesson from Iris Robinson, an uber-homophobic Member of Parliament who was found to have had an affair (with a man, the story isn't that poetic), isn't just to point and laugh (although I won't judge the Brits who want to do that), but that any form of strict one-size-fits-all sexual morality is so clearly bound to fail that one has to wonder if that isn't the entire purpose of such moralities. If you devise a way to make everyone feel ashamed about what they're doing in their private lives, then you can more easily control people and single out certain groups as failing to meet your standards because everyone is failing to meet those standards.

It takes a certain personality type, though, to become a moral hard-liner when one's breaking the rules themselves. And if they're breaking one while wagging their finger at everyone else, they're probably breaking a bunch for their own personal gain:

Homophobic MP Iris Robinson allegedly solicited £50,000 from two property developers to help her 19-year-old lover set up a business.

The Northern Ireland MP broke parliamentary rules by not declaring her interest in the business, despite sitting on the council which awarded the money to Kirk McCambley, it was claimed.

According to a BBC Spotlight programme broadcast last night, Mrs Robinson, 60, also demanded a £5,000 kickback from Mr McCambley for helping arrange the transaction.

We can only speculate as to why she'd risk her and her husband's much more lucrative careers for a mere 5000 pounds.

Mrs. Robinson is a big-time sexual sinner, although it wouldn't be important in a sane world if she were just honest about what she was doing and got her job done.

Of course, she has to go off the deep end and say Sally Kern-eque stuff like this:

Speaking on The Nolan Show, she was asked to comment on a homophobic assualt that took place in Newtownabbey.

Stephen Scott, 27, was attacked by a gang of youths on Wednesday and suffered head and leg injuries. The police are calling the incident homophobic in nature.

Mrs Robinson suggested that he should consider therapy to "cure" him of his homosexuality.

She condemned the attack on Mr Scott but added:

"I have a very lovely psychiatrist who works with me in my offices and his Christian background is that he tries to help homosexuals trying to turn away from what they are engaged in.

"And I have met people who have turned around to become heterosexual."

Mrs Robinson turned down an invitation from gay rights group Rainbow Project to meet with gay and lesbian people and hear about their experiences and concerns.

"I do not need to put my hand into the fire to know I will get burned," she commented.

"Homosexuality is not natural. My Christian beliefs tell me that it is an abomination and that is very clear.

"It is an offence to God, an offensive act and something that God abhors.

"My Christian beliefs tell me to love the sinner but hate the sin, so I condemn the people who went out and kicked that gay man.

"I am clearly not saying that I want people to thrash the living daylights out of a homosexual man or women, because I don't."

I wouldn't be one to say that the reason she's a homophobic moralizer is because she was having an affair. That's oversimplifying the situation. Rather, I think that most people have something like this going on in their lives, whether it be adultery or something else, and they just partition it into another part of their mind while they go out and tell the rubes what they should be doing with their genitalia. It takes a certain type to think that she or he is above the rules that they impose on others, and politics tends to attract that type.

Speaking of which, here's the Republican nominee for Massachusetts Senate to replace Ted Kennedy, posing naked for Cosmo:


The Boston Globe has more on his social views:

State Senator Scott P. Brown laughed last week when a national media personality asked him to elaborate on his politics: By describing himself as a fiscal conservative and an independent, did Brown mean to suggest he's a social liberal?

"No,'' Brown chuckled in the radio interview. "I'm not known as a social liberal, that's for sure.''[...]

"I think he is moving to the right,'' said Marion Just, a political science professor at Wellesley College.

He seems to be looking more to the Tea Party protesters than to the traditional Republican base here in the state, Just said. "But that's where the enthusiasm seems to lie.''

To be sure, the 30-year National Guardsman from Wrentham would never have been called a social liberal. Long a foe of gay marriage and a "tax-and-spend mentality,'' Brown calls himself a social moderate, and his work in the Legislature has focused on issues such as tightening restrictions on sex offenders.

While Robinson comes off as deeply disturbed, it'd be hard to argue that Brown is anything more than another arrogant playboy who'll believe whatever people want him to believe in order to get elected, so long as he's voting to lower taxes and deregulate business.

Can you imagine what sort of media storm a woman running for office would come under if pornographic photos were found of her? Or a gay man? But a straight dude gets naked and it's all in good fun.

You see, the rules are for those sluts and the rubes who pose naked because they're morally inferior and need to be protected from themselves. Superior, socially conservative straight men, though, they don't need any of that because when they pose naked for magazines it doesn't reflect on their character.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

I am sure Scott Brown's appeal would go down if he were advertised as the "Gay man's Adonis" in the gay press. With a body like his, I am sure it would be an easy sell. Then a bunch of gays would need to become groupies at all his public appearances carrying signs like "Scott, I love you" and "Marry me Scott" and "Gay Man for Scott".


Why do I suddenly have an urge to listen to Simon and Garfunkel?

Dee dee-dee-dee dee-dee dee-dee dee-dee dooo..

There's not really much to the Cosmo centerfold spread though. You can see guys walking around in public with their shirt off and wearing shorts and see about as much skin. Hell, even Levi Johnson showed more! LOL

To his credit, and it's one of the few credits I'll give him, Brown has described marriage equality as a settled issue in MA. He did fight it when it first came up and in the various attempts afterward to repeal it, but he's seen that once enacted (and held for a little while) retreating from a position of equal rights isn't a politically favorable position.

He strives to be a Massachusetts Republican in the vein of Bill Weld, Paul Cellucci, and Jane Swift, all Republican governors (two of whom we elected) who didn't really say boo about most social issues. Weld, Cellucci, and Swift were fiscal conservatives and deficit hawks, which Brown has been his entire career. Yes, he's shifted to the right on social issues during this election cycle, but that's mainly to differentiate himself from the Democratic candidate and likely winner, Martha Coakley.

The biggest difference between the two candidates is the healthcare issue. Brown pledges to be the 41st vote against it, while Coakley would follow Paul Kirk (the interim senator) and vote in favor, even if it's not everything she wants the bill to be.

I'll speculate that the reason the Democratic establishment in MA has stayed away from the Scott-Brown-was-naked issue is because it gives Brown carte blanche to attack Coakley on a "low" level. Throughout the primaries, Coakley tried to stay above the fray of the four-way duel she was engaged in, and changing tactic now won't work in her favor.

The short version: calling Brown out for hypocrisy just gives him an opening to attract moderates by highlighting his indifference to marriage equality.

Brown is no friend to the LGBT community. He may say marriage is settled but lemme tell ya, he's willing to lean as far right as the dollars take him.

For weeks, it was a no brainer- of course Coakley would win. I mean... it's MA, this is Ted Kennedy's seat- the primary was the end of it?

No such luck. As we are seeing all over the country, last ditch efforts, huge pockets of money for ads thrown in at last minute are taking easy wins into overtime.

Scott Brown is awful. And please tell me how far martha coakley would have made it in politics had SHE posed nude?

the double standard is a disgrace.