Nadine Smith

FL Atty General Bill McCollum's "Expert" Witness Caught with Male Prostitute

Filed By Nadine Smith | May 04, 2010 7:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Fundie Watch, Media, Politics
Tags: Attorney General, Bill McCollum, ex-gay, Florida, gay adoption, George Rekers, Miami, rentboy, Robert Gilbert

George Rekers, the "expert" witness hired by Attorney General Bill McCollum to defend Florida's anti-gay adoption ban has been caught with a male prostitute at the Miami airport, according to the Miami New Times.

Rekers was one of only two witnesses McCollum called in an effort to reverse a Miami judge who ruled Florida's adoption ban- the only one in the country- is unconstitutional.

McCollum paid Rekers and a colleague $87,000 for testimony that called gay people mentally unstable and advised that the ban should be expanded to include Native Americans because, Rekers claimed, they are also at much higher risk of mental illness and substance abuse.

"They would tend to hang around each other," Rekers testified. "So the children would be around a lot of other Native Americans who are ... doing the same sorts of things."

This latest controversy may shed new light on how outrageously biased and scientifically unsupported Rekers' testimony has been.

It is disgraceful that the attorney general used taxpayer dollars to compensate this discredited bigot-for-hire. It shows just how low they have to scrape to find anyone even willing to defend this awful ban that denies children permanent loving homes.

According to the Miami New Times Reker contacted an escort via a website called

On April 13, the "rent boy" (whom we'll call Lucien) arrived at Miami International Airport on Iberian Airlines Flight 6123, after a ten-day, fully subsidized trip to Europe. He was soon followed out of customs by an old man with an atavistic mustache and a desperate blond comb-over, pushing an overburdened baggage cart.

That man was George Alan Rekers, of North Miami -- the callboy's client and, as it happens, one of America 's most prominent anti-gay activists.

This is just the latest in a long string of controversies with Rekers at the center.

He is the founder of the rabidly anti-gay Family Research Council and serves on the board of directors for the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, which advocates "reparative therapy" to turn gays straight, a controversial practice strongly discouraged by the American Psychological Association.

As a paid witness, Reker relies on long-discredited research to justify banning gay people from adoption and dismisses numerous studies suggesting that children of gay parents are no worse off than those of straight parents. He has testified that he opposes gay parenting even if it flies in the face of scientific research.

In court, Rekers said that he favored removing children from any gay home in favor of a straight home, even if the child had been there 10 years. In an article form 2005, Reker compares allowing gay people seeking to adopt to terrorists and drug dealers.

"This is not basically different from denying placement in other households with structures that are not in the best interests of children. Fifteen-year-old couples, 90-year-old couples, Thai-language-only speaking couples, blind and deaf parents, households with a pedophilic-behaving adult, households with practicing criminals, households with drug dealers and drug abusers, households with unemployed adults, households that advocate the overthrow of the U.S. government, households with an active terrorist, households with sexually promiscuous unmarried men and women co-habitating and households with homosexually behaving adults all have either inherent instability or inherent disadvantage, stress, and potential harm to placed children," he said.

On Nov. 25, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Cindy Lederman struck down the adoption ban calling it "illogical to the point of irrationality" and allowed Frank Gill to adopt two children he had foster parented for six years.

Reker and his equally anti-gay colleague Walter Schumm were the only witnesses the state bothered to call. The ACLU, representing Frank Gill and his sons, filled the courtroom with child welfare experts and adoption and foster care specialists who testified that denying the adoption and removing the boys would inflict harm on the children.

The Orlando Weekly covered that testimony in detail:

Ronald Gilbert, the guardian ad litem appointed to look out for the children's rights, also testified that removing them would be "against their manifest best interests. I think it would be tragic. These kids were subject to abuse and neglect, and this would add legal abuse and neglect to their placement, and their mental and physical well-being." The state didn't cross-examine Gilbert.

Yves Francois, the adoption supervisor for the Center for Family and Child Enrichment - a DCF subcontractor that acts as an adoption agency - testified that Gill and Roe met all the criteria for adoption but one, their sexual orientation. If their adoption request was denied, he said, the CFCE would keep looking, and in all likelihood, the siblings would end up being separated. To date, no one else has applied to adopt James and John.

In her ruling, Lederman dismissed testimony from Rekers describing it as biased. "Dr. Rekers' beliefs are motivated by his strong ideological and theological convictions," she wrote. "The court cannot consider his testimony to be credible nor worthy of forming the basis of public policy."

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Note this man can tesify based on earning an MD degree once. But his current status.... is
A credentialled quack .. one who has the academic degrees required to practice a profession, in this case whether PhD or MD, and simultaneously held views and clinically used protocols that required the national professional organisation to drop him from accreditation with the profession. That is the definition of George A. Rekers. Hypocrite is just an additional observation.

This is comment re the EXPERT review of book he is trying to sell on Amazon.
Dr. George A. Rekers "University Professor"
This review is from: Ex-gays?: A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation (Paperback)

SarasNavel | May 5, 2010 4:09 AM

Oh, his quackery goes way back:

George Alan Rekers was harming children long before testifying in the Florida adoption case, which was before getting caught with a RentBoy despite his hatred of all things gay. Along with Richard Green, he headed up the ultimate example of quackery (ultimately based on falsified research), conversion/reparative therapy as applied to gender variant children from '72-'86.

From there things get interesting.

Google to connect the dots:
George Alan Rekers & Richard Green,
Kinsey, Money & Paul McHugh @ John Hopkins,
Money, Green & Ken Zucker,
Zucker & Paul McHugh,
Paul McHugh and the Vatican,
Zucker & McHugh & NARTH,
NARTH, American College of Pediatricians & George Alan Rekers

Hint: the nexus was the gay DSM delisting & the founding of NARTH; they are connected.

Correlate the researchers that were working together and publishing antigay/antitranssexual "research". Fast forward to their current involvements in the anti-gay, anti-trans Christian Right and the Catholic Church's attacks on LGBT people and their shielding of molesters within the fold.

The Vatican is advised on "scientific matters" by Paul McHugh. Anti-gay, anti-trans Paul McHugh shut down the gender clinic at John Hopkins. Current researchers at the time included John Money and the others, who saw nothing wrong with sex between adults and kids (plenty of statements from Money & Kinsey on this). McHugh stood behind them in their efforts to shield child molesters from legal prosecution. John Money and Paul McHugh influenced the likes of Ken Zucker, Baily, Blanchard...and Richard Green . Richard Green and George "Rentboy" Reker headed up the "Feminine Boy Project", where they requested other therapists refer "young, feminine boys" to them, for "treatment against prehomosexuality" (and once homosexuality was DSM delisted, "pretranssexuality").

Their careers are intertwined and each of them is in some way still harming the most vulnerable children, those born LGBT. Something very, very wrong ties that group together. My guess is that there are more closets to be cracked open.

I saw a story yesterday with the headline "Another homophobe caught... you know the story." I clicked and it was this, and, yes, it was entirely predictable.

10 days in Europe with a boy (compensated or uncompensated)? That's not the best way to keep a secret.

A. J. Lopp | May 5, 2010 11:12 AM

Alex, is that Freddie Mercury I hear in the background singing Another One Bites The Dust ?

Let's look at the bright side of things: if nothing else will now have a reputation for caring and healing of the sick and infirmed. Perhaps Nom's Brian Brown will solicit their "therapeutic techniques" next. Yet another hole in the armor of the homophobic right wing groups. Thanks Mr.Rekers, you've earned...a day at the bath house as well!

I'll bet is loving all of the free advertising to the LGBT community. :)

Wonder if Rekers was cured of his pain in the ass?

Florida Attorney GeneralBill McCollum paid Dr. George Rekers $87,000 to be an expert witness in the state's fight against abortion. Now the AG is running for Governor.

Within minutes of posting links to this story to Gubernatorial Candidate Bill McCollum's facebook page, all said links are removed. Continued posting earned me a warning from facebook that if I continued to post said links, my account with facebook could be shut down for posting 'abusive comments'. I assume an intern is constantly monitoring the AG's facebook page and deleting any posts about this off his site. Who knows, maybe the AG is using a rentboy to do the work. Let's keep him busy!

Update: AG McCollum's staff can't keep up with our postings. His facebook page is now filled with mostly comments about this story HA!

If there's any good to come out of this mess (besides the Florida ban being ruled unconstitutional) it's that no rational government agency will ever turn to Rekers again for "expert" testimony. That source of income for him has dried up permanently.