Guest Blogger

Enough is Enough: Andrew Shirvell Creates Climate of Harm & Hostility

Filed By Guest Blogger | October 06, 2010 8:30 AM | comments

Filed in: Living, Politics
Tags: Andrew Shirvell, anti-gay bullying, Campus Pride, Michigan, Shane Windmeyer, Warren Blumenfeld

Editors' Note: Shane Windmeyer is the executive director of Campus Pride, the only national organization for student leaders and campus organizations working to create a safer college environment for LGBT students. Warren J. Blumenfeld, Ed.D., is Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa. They co-wrote today's guest post.

What can clearly be referred to as an epidemic, within only the past few weeks, a number of gay young men have taken their lives by all indications as a result of the unrelenting homophobic taunts, shrivell2.jpgharassment, and attacks they had to endure by their peers: Seth Walsh, 13, hung himself from a tree outside his California home; Billy Lucas, 15, hung himself in Indiana; Asher Brown, 13, from Texas shot himself in the head; Tyler Clementi, 18, first-year student from Rutgers University took his life by jumping off the George Washington Bridge. And though we are not yet certain of the precipitating factors, now we hear of the tragic suicide of gay student, Raymond Chase, 19, from Johnson & Wales University in Rhode Island.

All this comes on the heels of the news from Michigan, where Assistant District Attorney, Andrew Shirvell, has been targeting University of Michigan's gay student-assembly president, Chris Armstrong, for the past six months with abusive and highly inflammatory epithets and images on his internet blog site. For example, Shirvell displayed a photo of a swastika placed over a gay-pride rainbow flag with an arrow pointing to Armstrong's face.

Also on the blog, Shirvell accused Armstrong of seducing "a previously conservative" student until he "morphed into a proponent of the radical homosexual agenda." He also has protested outside Armstrong's house, loudly shouting that Armstrong is "Satan's representative on the student assembly."

What has Chris Armstrong done as student-assembly president to incite such outrage? Well, he has advocated for the school cafeteria to remain open longer hours, and has campaigned for reduced student tuition fees. Certainly, these are not very "radical" ideas.

What about Chris's support for gender-neutral housing specifically for transgender students who have not yet undergone sex-reassignment surgery? This proposal shows the student-assembly president's deep sensitivity and advocacy for the emotional and physical safety concerns of a student population that is typically overlooked and underserved.

Asked to comment about his employee, Michigan attorney general Mike Cox stated, "His immaturity and lack of judgment outside the office are clear." Shirvell, however, continues to harass Chris. In fact, speaking with Anderson Cooper on CNN, Shirvell proclaimed, "I'm a Christian citizen exercising my First Amendment rights." With all the publicity surrounding his actions, on October 1, Shirvell decided to take a voluntary leave of absence from the Michigan Attorney General's office.

Focus on the Family, a conservative Christian media ministry organization, asserted in published accounts that gay rights advocates are forcing their viewpoints (their so-called "gay agenda") in schools in the guise of bullying prevention. Focus on the Family spokesperson, Candi Cushman, asserted that gay activists are the real schoolyard bullies while conservative Christians are the victims. According to Cushman, "We feel more and more that activists are being deceptive in using anti-bullying rhetoric to introduce their viewpoints, while the viewpoint of Christian students and parents are increasingly belittled."

Psychologist Albert Banbura showed that individuals learn by observing and associating with others. He asserted that the process of social modeling can be enough for young people to incorporate and act on their own beliefs and behaviors. If we are ever to interrupt the vicious cycle of bullying and cyberbully in our schools and in our society at large, one necessary step in the process is to make unacceptable abusive behaviors by adults, like Shirvell.

This past week Campus Pride released the 2010 State of Higher Education for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People which included 5,149 participants (LGBT students, faculty, staff, and administrators) representing over 2000 campuses in all fifty states. The report discovered that LGBT students, faculty, and staff remain at significantly higher risk, compared with their heterosexual and gender conforming counterparts, for harassment on our colleges and universities.

Participants reported that much of the neglect or overt hostility and harassment they experience on college and university campuses comes directly from professors and staff employees, and also from adult members within the off-campus community.

According to one participant of in the Campus Pride study: "Mine is a Catholic university. Questions of sexuality and gender identity are largely ignored - probably in the hope that they will go away. The administration works actively against GLBTQ groups and activities." A staff participant explained, "My department included me as long as I never mentioned my life or my partner. As soon as I did (like everyone else), people shut down."

Other participants underscored their experiences with psychological abuse and their fears for their physical safety. For example, one student participant noted, "Professors have pathologized my experiences as a member of the LGBT community by claiming that participating in activism within the LGBT community is indicative of mental illness."

Participants often claimed that, overall, their institutions are doing little or nothing to improve conditions. According to one participant, "Our campus is currently experiencing an anti-gay atmosphere that the institution is ignoring."

To engage in conversation, discussion, and dialogue (the overall learning process) entails a level of trust and respect, and involves an honest and open exchange of ideas. Once we digress into personal attacks, innuendo, character assassination, name calling, and calling into question another's motives, a critical line has been crossed, a line from civil discourse into bullying, and the potential for real education has been lost. Shirvell has done just that by engaging in acts of cyberbullying and harassment of college student Chris Armstrong.

Demeaning acts by bigots like Shirvell do a great disservice not only to those individuals impacted directly, but also to our universities, and to our entire community. If five gay youth suicides in the last three weeks is not enough of a tragedy to remind of us of the harms and hostility created by bigoted acts, then what does it take to move us to action as a nation to curb LGBT bias and hate?

Together we must call on Michigan attorney general Mike Cox to put an end to this. The potential harms associated with the safety of all Michigan college students are now at stake. The longer Shirvell is allowed to continue in his public service role, the greater the climate of harm and hostility grows. Complacency and inaction demonstrates acceptance. Enough is enough already.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Shirvell is a Christian.

No, he's really not. He can take the label all he wants, but the fact that he so clearly bastardizes the faith shows he's "in name only"-at best.

Well, help us out here - which Christian denominations have rejected the traditional Christian belief/teaching that "homosexuality is wrong."

Which Christians? Please make a list.

Put a sock in it, Andrew. It's getting old. You've been leaving the same comment on multiple threads. You're just repeating yourself now and everyone is tired of it. You're flogging a dead horse at this point. You've made your point - move on. Either add to the discussion or let it go.

That's the equivalent of admitting that none have. Thank-you.

By the way, that "dead horse" is killing our youth.

I'm curious. Many people have been saying Christianity doesn't preach against homosexuality. Why are you not telling THEM to put a sock in it? Last I looked this as a blog of, by, and for LGBT folks, not Christians. If anyone is off topic here, it's not Andrew.

Andrew (rightly so) is asking for an example of a group that believes this, and as yet nobody has answered him. I find it odd that you would lash out against Andrew, but not against those that keep defending Christianity (and bigots that label themselves Christians). Reality is, most Christian groups not only hold, but encourage and preach the belief that homosexuality is wrong. And many congregants, even those that believe otherwise, do not stand up for our community in church in the same way they stand up for their church in our community.

Don't get me wrong. Standing up for your faith is a good thing, but sometimes standing up IN your faith is more important. Especially when intolerance is being preached or condoned.

To Andrew:
Unitarian Universalists and the Society of Friends (aka Quakers) are two examples of Christians that, for decades, have rejected the teaching that homosexuality is wrong. The UU formed the Office of Gay Affairs in the 70s, which has advocated on behalf of the community in many matters over the years. And both have been performing non-traditional unions for quite some time.

Thanks Woody. I agree that this is an important (and timely) conversation to have.

UUs welcome and celebrate everything and don't identify as "Christian." They have a great attitude about spirituality and life. Quakers are a rather autonomous bunch, but many have not only accepted LGBT persons they sometimes reject the words in Leviticus and prefer to see the Bible as "spiritual guidance" rather than the word of God.

So, those are our two choices. I'd like to see more Christians have the courage to stand up for us and not just their denomination.

Last I looked this as a blog of, by, and for LGBT folks, not Christians. If anyone is off topic here, it's not Andrew.

I'm sure Bil is grateful that you explained what Bilerico is to him, since he's new around here and hasn't really gotten involved.

You've been quite sassy today, Alex.

But you're right, I missed a word or two. What I meant to say was: Last I looked this is promoted as a blog of, by, and for LGBT folks.

I'm fully aware the Bil runs the show here. If he's up for changing it into a blog for Christian LGBT folks, power to him. Maybe he'll consider banning folks that disagree too, like most Christian blogs tend to do.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not Christian bashing. (In fact, I'm a member of the Society of Friends, and consider myself Christian.) But when there's a stream of people here trying to deny that religion doesn't play a strong role in promoting homophobia here in the US, I think that needs to be chalenged.

To your earlier point on another thread, yes, people created Christianity, and some of the most virulent sects of it have morphed it into being anti-gay. But simply calling it "human nature" doesn't wash clean the hands of organized religious groups that perpetuate it today. People created bigotry and racism as well. It doesn't mean the KKK gets a free pass because it pre-dated their origin.

Alex is being childishly "cute." That's sweet. I'm not sure that fits the circumstances, but it's cute.

In point of fact I believe the United Church of Christ accepts LGBT persons into it's ranks. They even ordain some into their Ministry. Some of the others like the Episcopal, United Methodist, and others do with conditions. The fact is many churches will accept celibate LGBT persons. Some will accept them in committed relationships. On the other hand some are likely to speak openly against LGBT people, such as the Baptists, the Mormons, the Catholic Church, and most independent churches.

ALL of those denominations still teach/believe "homosexuality is wrong." Acceptance is a marketing effort. We don't need to be accepted, there is nothing wrong with us.

Back on topic: I noted pretty straight off that the accusations seem to match the accuser. Andrew is clearly of mixed race, republican, and probably a closet case. My guess is that he made a pass at Chris and was shot down. So now Chris is obviously a racist, a bigot, and a liar. (See how those line up so nicely?)

What's not tolerable is that someone can harass another person like this and not get called on it, especially when they're a government employee. If Andrew were taking drugs "on his own time", they'd fire him regardless of if it were interfering with his work productivity. This is no different, except here Andrew is trying to use the shield of religion to deflect taking responsibility for what is clearly harassment.

Personally, I hope Chris sues him for slander and defamation of character. But a restraining order is clearly a good first step.

I'm not sure about the mixed race thing. To my eyes, he looks like a crazed Pee-Wee herman...

Jerry Weiss | October 7, 2010 12:50 PM

Do you think Shirvell had/has the subconscious (?) hots for either Chris Armstrong or the "previously conservative student who morphed"? Nobody gets this angry for purely ideological or pseudo-spiritual reasons.

"Put a sock in it, Andrew."


Shirvell doesn't deserve anyone's time.

He has claimed that Armstrong is in a "promiscuous" relationship with another male student (note the use of the singular here). The only other place I've seen the word promiscuous misused in this manner is NARTH, the thoroughly discredited source of anti-gay pseudo-science.

Fire him for incurable stupidity and move on.

"Once we digress into personal attacks, innuendo, character assassination, name calling, and calling into question another's motives, a critical line has been crossed, a line from civil discourse into bullying, and the potential for real education has been lost."

Dear Bil,
Sounds a lot like some days on BILERICO ;-)