Guest Blogger

Intersex: Society's Rigidity vs. Nature's Resolve

Filed By Guest Blogger | May 24, 2014 1:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Living
Tags: Billings, Bozeman, intersex individuals, Montana, nondiscrimination ordinance

Editors' Note: Guest bloggers Jim Ambrose and Eden Atwood are longtime intersex advocates who co-founded the Interface Project in 2012. The mission of the Interface Project is to gather and share stories of people living with intersex traits or differences of sex development, and to spread the message that no body is shameful.

intersex-dual-gender.jpgThe nondiscrimination ordinances currently being debated in Billings and Bozeman, Montana bring up issues of fairness, safety, and how we understand sex and gender as altogether separate items. Indeed, what we learned in sex education class was cursory at best, and at worst, plain wrong.

We are the co-founders of The Interface Project, a nonprofit based in Missoula. Our mission is to share stories of people living with intersex traits, or differences of sex development, under the banner: No Body Is Shameful. We work with individuals born with such differences (ourselves included) to present powerful portraits of resilience, visibility, and authentic lived experience. We focus on dignity and self-determination: values we know Montanans hold dear.

An estimated one in 2,000 babies is born with a difference of sex development: a reproductive or sexual anatomy and/or chromosome pattern that doesn't seem to fit typical definitions of male or female. In 1993, The Sciences published "The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough" by renowned biologist, Anne Fausto-Sterling. This article was one of the first to debunk the myth of "vagina = female, penis = male" and concludes that bodies (especially genitals) have always varied widely in appearance and function.

What is widely known, but rarely discussed is:

  • There are as many ways to express one's gender as there are people in the world,
  • bodies do not fit neatly into the two molds we learned about as children, and
  • our genitals, chromosomes, and hormones often have nothing to do with how we express our gender, live our life, or choose our partner.

As Judith Butler recently stated, "My sense is that we may not need the language of innateness or genetics to understand that we are all ethically bound to recognize another person's declared or enacted sense of sex and/or gender. We do not have to agree upon the "origins" of that sense of self to agree that it is ethically obligatory to support and recognize sexed and gendered modes of being that are crucial to a person's well-being."

Or as another decorated biologist put it: "Nature loves variety. Unfortunately, society hates it.

Differently bodied people and differently gendered people will require protection and thoughtful consideration as long as society's rigidity continues to clash with nature's resolve.

We encourage the City Councils of Billings and Bozeman to pass fully inclusive nondiscrimination ordinances.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.