Ed Team

Leaders Will "Go To Prison" To Stop Marriage Equality

Filed By Ed Team | June 15, 2015 10:03 AM | comments

Filed in: The Movement
Tags: Defendmarriage.org, Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum

A group of anti-gay pastors and leaders, including presidential hopefuls Huckabee and Santorum, have signed onto a ledge, defendmarriage.org. The group has also taken out a full page ad recently in the Washington Post for the pledge.

The petition has gathered 45,000 signatures thus far and even though Texas Pastor Rick Scarborough said members of Congress were "lining up" to sign the pledge, none have done. News Radio 1200 WOAI reports:

With the U.S. Supreme Court expected to rule in the coming weeks that same sex marriage is legal, many Christian evangelicals say they will refuse to obey the new law, and are prepared to go to prison if necessary, News Radio 1200 WOAI reports.

"However the law is changed, I will do what I have always done," he said. "I will continue to preach that homosexuality is a sinful life style."

Scarborough says some 40,000 pastors and church leaders have signed a petition at www.defendmarriage.org. He says those who signed the petition will 'resist all government efforts to require them to accept gay marriage, and they will accept any fine and jail time to protect their religious freedom and the freedom of others.'

Read some of the pledge after the jump.

The Pledge States:

The Supreme Court was wrong when it denied Dred Scott his rights and said, "blacks are inferior human beings." And the Court was wrong when Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Buck v. Bell, "three generations of imbeciles are enough," thus upholding Virginia's eugenics law that permitted forced sterilization. Shamefully, that decision was cited during the Nuremburg trials to support the Nazi eugenic holocaust.

In these earlier cases, the definition of "human" was at issue. Now the definition of "marriage" is at issue. The Constitution does not grant a right to redefine marriage -- which is nonsensical since marriage intrinsically involves a man and a woman. Nor does the Constitution prohibit states from affirming the natural created order of male and female joined together in marriage.

We will view any decision by the Supreme Court or any court the same way history views the Dred Scott and Buck v. Bell decisions. Our highest respect for the rule of law requires that we not respect an unjust law that directly conflicts with higher law. A decision purporting to redefine marriage flies in the face of the Constitution and is contrary to the natural created order. As people of faith we pledge obedience to our Creator when the State directly conflicts with higher law. We respectfully warn the Supreme Court not to cross this line.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.